It hardly needs to be emphasised that the biggest threat to peace in
today’s world comes from the Taliban and their fellow-Islamic radicals operating
in the Af-Pak region. Both Afghanistan and Pakistan are devastated by terrorists
who call themselves Islamists and are perpetrating the most horrifying massacres
of innocent civilians, even during prayers inside mosques. They claim to be
establishing what they call “pure Islam”, by eliminating mainstream
interpretations of Islam and minority sects whom they do not recognise as
Muslim. These medieval obscurantists also use the excuse of western domination
of Muslim lands to further their nefarious ends. They never explain, however,
what have Western domination attempts got to do with their medieval terrorist
actions like burning schools for girls and oppressing women and killing
religious minorities in particular, terrorising and violating the human rights
of people in that area in the most blatant manner possible.
But even more worrisome is the fact that the world’s determination to
confront these roguish elements appears to be flagging. NATO countries seem to be losing interest in
what looks like an endless war. … Also, a group of Taliban sympathisers appears
to have grown recently not only in the civil society but also in the strategic
community which seems to feel that not all Taliban are bad and that it is
possible to make a deal with the good ones who are the majority of Taliban, thus
providing a route to a safe exit, leaving the volatile region to its fate, as
has been done several times before.
The frontline ally of the West in the war on terror, Pakistan and its
Army in particular, clearly feel the same way with the difference that for them,
the Taliban devastating Pakistani cities are the bad ones and should be fought
while the Taliban fighting the West or their allies like Lashkar-e-Tayyaba,
creating mayhem periodically in India are the good ones and should be left
alone. There are sensible elements in Pakistan too who see the inhuman and
suicidal nature of this policy. But the policy has by and large remained the
same. Indeed, Pakistan Army has made several attempts to cut deals with the bad
Pakistani Taliban too, only to face fresh subversion and terrorism from them
once they used the breathing space to regroup. …
There are many factors involved including strategic and tactical
errors on the part of Western forces combating the Taliban. But the most glaring
failure has been on the part of us mainstream Muslims in not evolving a
redefinition of Islamic postulates that would have left no room for the radicals
to misuse Islam and our holy book, the Quran, for their nefarious ends. We did
keep saying that Islam is a religion of peace, but that clearly has not been
enough. We probably took continued Western support for granted in putting down
this inferno of hate and contempt for other religious groups caused by the
ideology of Islam-supremacism. This ideology is far older than the Western quest
for power and wealth in recent decades and centuries that Taliban sympathisers
give us as the reason for radicalisation of Muslim groups. …
We the mainstream Muslims have no option but to take a more
pro-active attitude in this existential struggle against radical, political
Islam based on the ideology of Islam-supremacism. The West too would probably
continue to help us in the war against the Taliban and other Jihadi terrorists,
if they see that we are serious about this fight. We need to own this war as our
war, as primarily it is a war within Islam; even the far larger number of dead
bodies from the Muslim community testify to this.
The ideological dimension of this war has been completely lost. After
all, suicide bombers do not perpetrate their heinous acts just because they have
been offered a few hundred thousand rupees. They have been brainwashed into
believing that they need to kill all “infidels”. Moreover, they have been told that those
Muslims who are not engaged in fighting “the infidel” are the first and foremost
enemies of Islam and need to be eliminated first and that the person who does
that will be rewarded instantly with a place in heaven.
This is no place to engage in theological debates, but I
can assure the world through this august forum that there is no room for this
kind of thinking in the Islam that Prophet Mohammad had left
behind.
However, by leaving the war to be fought only with military means
and by Western victims of Jihadi terrorism alone, we the mainstream Muslims have
left the field open for prejudices to be formed against all of us and our
religion. I find it difficult to blame the average citizens of non-Muslim world
who are fast developing Islamophobic tendencies. While there indeed are forces
in the non-Muslim countries who are exploiting the situation to further their
own vested interests, I feel that it is the total passivity of mainstream Islam,
the nonchalance of the moderate Muslims that is largely to blame for this state
of affairs. I hope the time has not
passed for us to do something about it and join the struggle in earnest. The war
against Jihadi terror has to be fought and won by us Muslims on the ideological
front, hopefully with continued military backing of the West. ---
Sultan Shahin, Editor, New Age Islam, speaking at the UN Human Rights Council’s
Fourteenth session in Geneva on 15 June 2010.
UN Human Rights Council, Fourteenth session
Agenda Item 8: General Debate on Vienna Declaration and Programme of
Action
Oral Statement by SULTAN SHAHIN, Editor, New Age
Islam
On behalf of: International Club for Peace Research
(ICPR)
15 June 2010
Mr President,
It hardly needs to be emphasised that the biggest threat to peace in
today’s world comes from the Taliban and their fellow-Islamic radicals operating
in the Af-Pak region. Both Afghanistan and Pakistan are
devastated by terrorists who call themselves Islamists and are perpetrating the
most horrifying massacres of innocent civilians, even during prayers inside
mosques. They claim to be establishing what they call “pure Islam”, by
eliminating mainstream interpretations of Islam and minority sects whom they do
not recognise as Muslim. These medieval obscurantists also use the excuse of
western domination of Muslim lands to further their nefarious ends. They never
explain, however, what have Western domination attempts got to do with their
medieval terrorist actions like burning schools for girls and oppressing women
and killing religious minorities in particular, terrorising and violating the
human rights of people in that area in the most blatant manner possible.
But even more worrisome is the fact that the world’s determination to
confront these roguish elements appears to be flagging. NATO countries seem to be losing interest in
what looks like an endless war. Despite the daily news reports detailing stories
of murder and mayhem in Af-Pak region and the very real possibility of this
happening in their part of the world as well, exemplified by several recent
terrorist attempts, many people think it is not worth their while spending
hard-earned money to beat the enemies of civilisation in a remote part of the
world.
Also, a group of Taliban sympathisers appears to have grown recently
not only in the civil society but also in the strategic community which seems to
feel that not all Taliban are bad and that it is possible to make a deal with
the good ones who are the majority of Taliban, thus providing a route to a safe
exit, leaving the volatile region to its fate, as has been done several times
before.
The frontline ally of the West in the war on terror, Pakistan and its
Army in particular, clearly feel the same way with the difference that for them,
the Taliban devastating Pakistani cities are the bad ones and should be fought
while the Taliban fighting the West or their allies like Lashkar-e-Tayyaba,
creating mayhem periodically in India are the good ones and should be left
alone. There are sensible elements in Pakistan too who see the inhuman and
suicidal nature of this policy. But the policy has by and large remained the
same. Indeed, Pakistan Army has made several attempts to cut deals with the bad
Pakistani Taliban too, only to face fresh subversion and terrorism from them
once they used the breathing space to regroup.
Meanwhile, general populace in large parts of Pakistan itself, in the biggest and most
influential province of Punjab , for instance, is being radicalised
and acquiring sympathies for the Taliban and their terrorist allies, fed up as
they are with massive corruption and misgovernance of the ruling elite. This
trend is very clear now and poses a grave threat to world peace, not least
because Pakistan is a nuclear state almost
permanently on the brink of joining the ranks of failed
states.
It is imperative in this scenario that we not only take a fresh
pledge to continue confronting the medieval marauders but also to look at the
reasons why humanity’s efforts have not met with the kind of success they should
have. There are many factors involved including strategic and tactical errors on
the part of Western forces combating the Taliban. But the most glaring failure
has been on the part of us mainstream Muslims in not evolving a redefinition of
Islamic postulates that would have left no room for the radicals to misuse Islam
and our holy book, the Quran, for their nefarious ends. We did keep saying that
Islam is a religion of peace, but that clearly has not been enough.
Mr President,
We probably took continued Western support for granted in putting
down this inferno of hate and contempt for other religious groups caused by the
ideology of Islam-supremacism. This ideology is far older than the Western quest
for power and wealth in recent decades and centuries that Taliban sympathisers
give us as the reason for radicalisation of Muslim groups. Not long after
Prophet Mohammad’s death, Arab imperialists who were inveterate enemies of
Islam’s ideology of human equality and respect for all religions practically
hijacked Islam and created a hereditary monarchical system in the name of
Khilafat that immediately embarked on a project of imperialist expansion. Then,
in order to justify the misuse of Islam to run an unIslamic system of
imperialist expansion based on Islam-supremacism, they undermined the only
scripture the Prophet had left behind, the Quran, and created a parallel
scripture called Hadith (Sayings of the Prophet). Compiled two to three
centuries after the death of the Prophet, these sayings were attributed to the
prophet and were advertised as marvels of research in which meticulous care had
been taken to find out the route through which the saying had travelled for two
to three centuries before being written down. A mere glance at some of these
sayings recorded in what are considered the most authentic compilations, the
voluminous Bukhari and Muslim, shows that some of these sayings had been
concocted to suit the imperialist tendencies and even the lecherous nature of the monarch-khalifas. But nevertheless, through massive and
constant propaganda Hadith was made to occupy the same space in the minds of
average Muslims as the Quran, if not more so. It is no accident that the most
influential ideological group among the radical Jihadis calls itself Ahle-Hadees
(People of Hadith), people who believe in the Hadith probably even as superior
to the Quran.
These monarchs also created another very powerful institution to
enslave Muslims and control them: the clergy. Mullahdom or any kind of
priesthood was not part of Islam when the Prophet made his transition to the
other world, saying he was satisfied that he had completed Islam. But the
hijacked and subverted Islam that we have inherited through centuries made sure
that Muslims largely do not consult the Quran for guidance on ideological
issues. They have been told it is too difficult for them to understand. Instead
they go to the Mullah who invariably misguides them, keeping in mind his own
interests and that of the rulers he has traditionally
served.
We the mainstream Muslims have no option but to take a more
pro-active attitude in this existential struggle against radical, political
Islam based on the ideology of Islam-supremacism. The West too would probably
continue to help us in the war against the Taliban and other Jihadi terrorists,
if they see that we are serious about this fight. We need to own this war as our
war, as primarily it is a war within Islam; even the far larger number of dead
bodies from the Muslim community testify to this.
The ideological dimension of this war has been completely lost. After
all, suicide bombers do not perpetrate their heinous acts just because they have
been offered a few hundred thousand rupees. They have been brainwashed into
believing that they need to kill all “infidels”. Moreover, they have been told that those
Muslims who are not engaged in fighting “the infidel” are the first and foremost
enemies of Islam and need to be eliminated first and that the person who does
that will be rewarded instantly with a place in heaven.
This is no place to engage in theological debates, but I
can assure the world through this august forum that there is no room for this
kind of thinking in the Islam that Prophet Mohammad had left
behind.
However, by leaving the war to be fought only with military means and
by Western victims of Jihadi terrorism alone, we the mainstream Muslims have
left the field open for prejudices to be formed against all of us and our
religion. I find it difficult to blame the average citizens of non-Muslim world
who are fast developing Islamophobic tendencies. While there indeed are forces
in the non-Muslim countries who are exploiting the situation to further their
own vested interests, I feel that it is the total passivity of mainstream Islam,
the nonchalance of the moderate Muslims that is largely to blame for this state
of affairs. I hope the time has not
passed for us to do something about it and join the struggle in earnest. The war
against Jihadi terror has to be fought and won by us Muslims on the ideological
front, hopefully with continued military backing of the West.
0 comments:
Post a Comment