Pages

Showing posts with label Abu Muhammad al-Afriqi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Abu Muhammad al-Afriqi. Show all posts

Thursday, June 14, 2012

Politics, Terrorism, Wahhabism, Muslim Brotherhood and the Sunni Divide, Islam and Sectarianism, NewAgeIslam.com

Islam and Sectarianism
Politics, Terrorism, Wahhabism, Muslim Brotherhood and the Sunni Divide
By Samuel Helfont
29 Sep 2009

One could even argue that the most important division shaping Arab politics is not between Sunnis and Shias but between the Wahhabis and the Brotherhood. Before delving into current issues, however, it is first necessary to define differences between Wahhabism and the Muslim Brotherhood.

Wahhabism stems from the theological teachings of Muhammad ibn abd al-Wahhab, the eighteenth century reformer. Abd al-Wahhab was one of several “revivalist” thinkers to emerge from that century. The mission of these revivalists was to purify and thereby revitalize Islam. They carried the banner of reform but unlike modern reformers, they wanted to transform Islam on traditionally Islamic grounds. They did not attempt to adapt it to other systems of thought, politics, or culture. Their goals did not include modernizing Islam to meet the demands of a changing world. In this sense they were pre-modern.

Wahhabism is thus, at its heart, a pre-modern theological movement and Wahhabists continue to make mostly theological arguments about the oneness of God and proper forms of worship. Their historical mission has been a call to reform Islam according to a strict and narrowly defined theology. There are, of course, political implications to this understanding of Islam, but Wahhabism is still best understood as a theological reform movement.

The Muslim Brotherhood, on the other hand, is a political organization originating in Egypt’s cosmopolitan cities during the twentieth century. The Brotherhood’s Islamism is one of several political ideologies to emerge out of Egypt in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century. Like Pan-Arabism, nationalism, and socialism, which also emerged in Egypt at that time, the Brotherhood’s Islamism is at its heart a political identity.

http://newageislam.com/politics,-terrorism,-wahhabism,-muslim-brotherhood-and-the-sunni-divide/islam-and-sectarianism/d/1816


Wednesday, June 13, 2012

Barack Obama effect on The Nation of Islam, Islam and the West, NewAgeIslam.com

Islam and the West
Barack Obama effect on The Nation of Islam
By Anna Clark
June 9, 2009

As Walters points out, the uncomfortable intersection of the Nation and the Office of the President dates back to Malcolm X’s remarks in the wake of John F. Kennedy’s assassination in 1963. Malcolm X described the assassination as a case of the “chickens coming home to roost”; meaning that the violence the Kennedy administration failed to stop came back to hurt him. Public anger at Malcolm X and the negative attention cast upon the Nation of Islam led then-leader Elijah Muhammad to officially silence his most famous minister. Malcolm X left the Nation a short time later.

Likewise, in 1984, Farrakhan vocalized his support for the Rev. Jesse Jackson’s presidential campaign. But remarks that Farrakhan made that same year drew fire for being anti-Semitic. Farrakhan described the founding of Israel as ‘’an outlaw act’’ and Judaism as a ‘’gutter religion’’—though the minister fervently denied using that term and claimed, further, that he was referring to Israel’s use of Judaism rather than to the nature of the tradition itself.

http://newageislam.com/barack-obama-effect-on-the-nation-of-islam--/islam-and-the-west/d/1463


The “Hidden Imam” of the Shiites – myth or reality?, Islam and Sectarianism, NewAgeIslam.com

Islam and Sectarianism
The “Hidden Imam” of the Shiites – myth or reality?
The Myth of the Shi‘i Mahdi
By Abu Muhammad al-Afriqi

When Husayn died there were some who claimed to follow their other brother Muhammad (known as Ibn al-Hanafiyyah) as their Imam. When he died his followers claimed that he was in reality alive, and that he will return in due time. Others amongst the Shi‘ah took Sayyiduna Husayn’s son, Ali, surnamed Zayn al-‘Abidin, as their Imam, and upon his death transferred their loyalties to his son, Muhammad al-Baqir.

When al-Baqir died there were once again elements from amongst the Shi‘ah who denied his death and claimed that he would return one day, while others took his son Ja‘far as-Sadiq as their Imam.

When he died there was mass confusion amongst the Shi‘ah: each of his sons Isma‘il, Abdullah, Muhammad, Zakariyya, Ishaq and Musa was claimed by various groups amongst the Shi‘ah to be their Imam. In addition to them there was a group who believed that Ja‘far did not really die, and that he would return one day.

More or less the same thing happened at the death of his son Musa. Some of the Shi‘ah denied his death, believing that he will return, and others decided to take as their new Imam one of his sons. Some of these chose his son Ahmad, while others chose his other son Ali ar-Rida.

http://newageislam.com/the-%E2%80%9Chidden-imam%E2%80%9D-of-the-shiites-%E2%80%93-myth-or-reality?--/islam-and-sectarianism/d/1178