“Maulana" Maududi -The man who sank the Ummah deeper into the quagmire of Ajami Islam
Let us examine some brilliance
of Maududi through his famous Six Volume Tafseer, Tafhimul Quran (Urdu), by
Idara Tarjumanul Quran, Lahore , November, 1982. We will turn to his other
writings from time to time, with due reference
given.
The Marriageable Age: According to the Mullahs, the beginning of
the menstrual cycles in a girl and nocturnal emissions in a boy are firm
indicators of their age of marriage. To the unfortunate Mullah, everything
revolves around sex. A Hadith from Bukhari atrociously tells us that a girl can
have Nikah (the marital contract) at 6 and the marriage can be consummated at
age 9 since the exalted Prophet did that with Hazrat Ayesha! Is there any wonder
that the West call him a child-molester? Why don't then the Sunnah-peddlers
"marry off" their daughters at 6 and 9? Many countries set an arbitrary 16 years
for the girl and 18 years for the boy. The Divine Wisdom enshrined in the Quran
makes things so sensible. It sets up three rational
criteria:
1 -
Sufficient maturity to grant consent. (4:21)
2 -
Ability to sign a legal contract. (4:19)
3 -
Competence to take care of one's own finances.
(4:21)
SUCKLING ON THE BREASTS OF A YOUNG
WOMAN: This is a horrible
Hadithi joke. Bukhari writes that Hazrat Ayesha’s goat had eaten up the
date-leaf upon which were written two Quranic verses. This is supposed to have
happened when there was chaos at home because of the demise of the Prophet (S).
One of those verses was about stoning the ‘Sheikh and Sheikhah, a mature or
married man and woman, committing adultery. The other verse was about the
grown-up men suckling on a young woman.
The
goat-eaten, non-existent, “Ten Sucklings
Verse” (the so-called Ayah Ridha'at) is a horrible joke. The 'Imams' of
Hadith report that Hazrat Ayesha advised women of an 'easy' way to admit
unrelated men into their privacy. Let any grown up unrelated man suckle on the
woman's breasts on ten different occasions and lo and behold! He becomes a
Mahram (one who is a family member and can intrude into their privacy from then
on). (Hadith 1934 Ibn Majah, 30:12 Malik’s Muwatta and Bukhari about the
‘criminal’ goat). About foster mothers, the Quran clearly
states:
4:23 The
following women are prohibited for you in marriage: Your … foster-mothers who
have ever nursed you, foster-sisters … -- Dr Shabbir
Ahmad
Haqeeqat khurafat mein kho
ga'iee
Yeh ummat riwayaat mein kho
gaiee
-*Iqbal
The Mullah-In-Chief Of The 20th Century:
Maududi (1903-1979)
By Dr Shabbir
Ahmad
We will have to be brief about
Maududi since he has written volumes upon volumes of nonsense. But a few
glimpses should sufficiently demonstrate how the Mullah is playing god to his
fans even after his death.
His Name: Before presenting some glimpses of
the famous Mullah Maududi’s wisdom and knowledge, let us reflect on his full
name and title, Maulana Syed Abul A’la Maududi. The name translates as: “Our
Master, Owner, the Father of the Most Glorious, Maududi”. It is strange that the
man claiming to be a great Islamic scholar lived 76 odd years with this name.
Does it need much insight to see that the very name is shrieking outright
divinity and Shirk? According to the Quran, Maulana (our Master) is none but
Allah (9:51). And, obviously, Al-A’la
(the Most Glorious) can be none but God.
Note: In this article, as an
example, 1:31 will mean Vol 1 page 31.
His Impact: The treacherous, imbecile Maududi,
through his long, confused, confusing and inconclusive writings, has frozen the
minds of millions of simple Muslims for the last half century making sure that
the Ummah remains stuck in the spider-web of the manmade, counterfeit, Hadithi,
Number Two Islam (N2I). The forsakers of the Quran got exactly what they
deserved. A significant factor behind his popularity has been the generous royal
Saudi support as in the case of the Egyptian Mullah-in-Chief, Syed Qutb in the
1950s.
Maududi’s
‘Brilliance’: Let us examine
some brilliance of Maududi through his famous Six Volume Tafseer, Tafhimul Quran
(Urdu), by Idara Tarjumanul Quran, Lahore , November, 1982. We will turn to his
other writings from time to time, with due reference given.
The Captive
Women: 1:340 means Vol 1 Pg
340. The summary and conclusion of his discussion on war captives, Vol 1 Pg
340:Even today, the government must distribute the women war captives among
Muslim soldiers and the soldiers should “use” them.This rule will apply to women
regardless of whether they belong to the People of the Book, or any other
religion. How would the Mullahs feel if Muslims, getting thrashed all around the
world today, had their women treated by the ‘infidels’ in this abominable
fashion?
The Quran, verse 47:4 states that the captives
of war must be freed either for ransom (e.g. exchange of POWs) or as an act of
kindness as soon as the battle ends. There is no third option. When an eminent
scholar differed with him and showed how the Quran has closed the door of
slavery forever, Maududi responded, “The error of this man lies in that he
relies on the Quran to form his opinion.” (Tafhimat 2:292)
Slavery: Maududi further alleges
that:
v
A slave owner can sell his slave whenever and to whomever he
pleases.
v The act of kindness means that the
captives be made slaves and given into the ownership of (Muslim)
individuals.
v A bondwoman given to any man by the
rulers is as legal and binding a process as Nikah (marriage).
v A captive of war will remain a slave even
if he or she embraces Islam.
v If a slave tries to escape or create
mischief, the master has the right to kill him/her.
v While the Shari’ah (religious law made up
by Mullahs) has limited the number of wives to four, it places NO LIMIT to the
number of concubines a man can possess. He can have sexual relations with them
freely. There is no reason for any man to feel bad about having sex with these
(captured) concubines. (Tafhimul Quran 1:340 onwards, and 5:14
onwards)
Beware! Dear reader, whenever you encounter
statements like “Islam says this,” or “Shari’ah states that,” knows that it is
almost invariably the Mullah’s own wishful thinking rather than the Word of
God.
The Prophet’s Broken Teeth: In Tafhimul Quran
5:14 and Tarjaman-ul-Quran 1975 Pg 93, Maududi, on the spurious authority of Ibn
Hisham, happily relates that the idolater Sohail bin ‘Umro was captured at the
Battle of Badr. Some companions wanted to break his teeth, for he was a fiery
orator against Islam. The Prophet admonished, “No! If I break his teeth, Allah
will break my teeth even though I am a Prophet.” Sohail was left alone, but even
then, after one year, at the Battle of Uhud, the exalted Prophet’s teeth were
broken. In the Quran, Allah promises to protect the Prophet (S) from people
(5:67). What sinister point is Maududi trying to make? Did the Prophet (S)
really lose his teeth in the Battle of Uhud? He lived nine more years after that
battle. I have not come across a single narrative suggesting any missing teeth
on the person of the exalted Prophet.
Child Molestation: It is not only permissible
to give in marriage the girls who have not had their menstrual periods yet.
Rather, it is also permissible for the husbands to have sexual intercourse with
them. Now it is obvious that something that has been allowed by the Quran, no
Muslim has the right to declare it forbidden. (Mullah Maududi, Tafhimul Quran
5:571). Did he marry ‘off’ his daughters or nieces at age 6 or
9?
The Mullahs are in the habit of opposing the
Quran since the Glorious Book hurts their evil desires. The big question arises
here, “Does the Quran permit this nonsense?” Here is the
answer:
The Marriageable Age: According to the
Mullahs, the beginning of the menstrual cycles in a girl and nocturnal emissions
in a boy are firm indicators of their age of marriage. To the unfortunate
Mullah, everything revolves around sex. A Hadith from Bukhari atrociously tells
us that a girl can have Nikah (the marital contract) at 6 and the marriage can
be consummated at age 9 since the exalted Prophet did that with Hazrat Ayesha!
Is there any wonder that the West call him a child-molester? Why don't then
theSunnah-peddlers "marry off" their daughters at 6 and 9? Many countries set an
arbitrary 16 years for the girl and 18 years for the boy. The Divine Wisdom
enshrined in the Quran makes things so sensible. It sets up three rational
criteria:
1 - Sufficient maturity to grant
consent. (4:21)
2 - Ability to sign a legal
contract. (4:19)
3 - Competence to take care of
one's own finances. (4:21)
If Someone Dies of Hunger: If
someone dies of hunger, he dies because Allah had written for him to die of
hunger. (Tarjumanul Quran, Jan. 1966). Should the government and the community
be so easily absolved of their fundamental duty? The Prophet (S) is reported to
have said in a well-known Hadith, “If a single person sleeps hungry in a
community, Allah removes His protection from that people.” Also, Hazrat Umar is
reported to have said, “If a dog were to die of hunger by the Euphrates, I am
afraid Umar will be held responsible.”
How to Establish a Solid
Islamic State: Maududi shows
a brilliant way to establish a solid Islamic state: Send notice to the
population that they must announce within one year whether they should be
considered Muslims or non-Muslims. After that one year, all children born to
Muslims will be considered Muslims. All those who register as Muslims will be
forced to observe the worships and rituals of Islam, five prayers a day, Friday
prayers, 2.5 percent charity well-documented, fasting in the month of Ramadhan,
Pilgrimage to Makkah for the affluent, sacrificing a sheep or goat at least once
a year etc. Then whoever falls short of these obligations of Islam, will be
beheaded. (Murtad Ki Saza, Punishment of the Apostate, August 1953, Pg 76).
Please note that many Mullahs considered Maududi a heretic apostate. He might
have been the first to be put to sword. If this brilliant concept of Maududi is
implemented, all the Muslim population of that ‘solid’ Islamic state will walk
around without heads on their shoulders.
The Prophet Was Forgetful: The Prophet came to
lead prayers. People lined up. He then started to leave, realizing that he was
“junbb” (he had not done the post-coital wash). He left the standing lines and
went to take a bath. Then he came back with water trickling. (Tarjumanul Quran,
Oct 1956). Maududi presents this insult on the authority of Bukhari reminding
the reader that Bukhari also states that it is Satan who causes men to forget
during Salaat.
The Noble Ones Lived In Glass Houses: Maududi
and other “experts” seem anxious to prove that the Prophet (S) was a forgetful
person and that he and his companions walked around junbb. Did the exalted
Prophet and his companions live in glass houses and had no sense of privacy?
Were they so obsessed with sex? Or is it
our Mullahs who are so obsessed? There are ample traditions filled with
references to sex, ways of making love, lust, post-coital bath, menstruation,
divorce, suckling, slaves, concubines, houris, etc with shameless detail. The
grand Vision and the Supreme Ideology of Islam remain elusive to these small
minds. The Prophet (S) and his companions were busy creating the noblest
revolution in human history and they had no time for this kind of
nonsense.
Copies of the Quran Were
Burned: Hazrat Uthman burned six copies of the
Quran which were all in different tongues. Allah and Rasul had not ordered him
to do this. (Syed Maududi, Tarjumanul Quran 1975 Pg 39). Did Maududi witness
this? Does the Quran state that it has been revealed in different ways, tongues
or dialects?
Is There Life In The Grave? The belief of life in the grave is dangerous and that of no life is
also dangerous. (Maududi, Tarjumanul Quran, Dec. 1959). The all knowing Mullah
should have checked with the Quran to find the answer. Dead means dead. It is
the human nafs, or self that lives on, not the material body. And according to
the Quran, the dead do not return to this world. (23:100, 32:12). Death is a
prolonged state of sleep until the Day of Resurrection, according to the Quran
as shown below.
36:51 And when the Trumpet is blown, out of
their disintegrated states to their Lord they will run.
36:52 They will say, “Oh, woe to
us! Who has awakened us from our beds of sleep? ---.”
Doom of the
Grave – Without Judgment: These two verses strongly
dismiss the clergy-peddled false concept of punishment in the grave. Will God
punish the dead before the Day of Resurrection and before Judgment? Many kinds
of suffering (‘Azaab) are named in the Quran but ‘Azaabil Qabr (Doom of the
Grave) is not mentioned even once. But Mullah Maududi writes in his
Tarjaman-ul-Quran Dec. 1959: Most people will suffer the doom of the grave until
the Day of Resurrection, some of them because they used to eat in
bed.
Maududi’s Religious
Freedom: In an Islamic
country, non-Muslims will have full rights to spread their belief, but we will
not allow any Muslim to change his or her religion. (Tarjumanul Quran, Dec.1959
Pg 269). The Mullah would behead the ‘apostate’. Can you see the blatant and
silly contradiction here? According to the Quran, there is no compulsion in
religion. (2:256)
Ah! The ‘Infidel’ Kids: Children
of non-Muslims will go to Paradise and will be made slaves of the owners of
Paradise. (Ref same, Pg 134). The Mullah probably lived under the wishful
thinking that he would be the owner of Paradise! How about slavery, even in
Paradise? Maududi never thought that his own children could be eternal
slaves.
The daughters of non-Muslims who
died young will be made hoors of Paradise . (Asia, Lahore, June 14, 1969). And how will they be treated? According to
Maududi, the men of Paradise will have their young, full-breasted houris indoors
in their palaces. And the little infidel 'houri girls', eternally staying
little, will live in beautiful outdoor tents. Men of Paradise will have sex with
them whenever they go about strolling in the evenings. Ah, the poor ‘infidel’
kids!
Telling Lies May Be Mandatory: Truth is one of the most important
principles of Islam and lying is one of the greatest sins. But in real life,
needs arise when telling lies is not only allowed, rather it becomes mandatory.
(Tarjumanul Quran, May 1958 Pg 54)
Temporary Marriage (Mut’ah) is permissible
under certain circumstances. (Tarjumanul Quran, August 1955). Maududi puts
forward an example: If a man and woman get stranded on an island, as soon as
they procure food, they should go ahead and indulge in sex regardless of their
marital status.
Calling Upon The Dead
Saints: In response to a question concerning praying
at gravesites to the dead saints, Maududi maintains,“It is possible that you may
be calling, but they may not be listening. It is also possible that they may be
able to listen, but their soul might not be there and you may be calling nobody.
Also, it may be that they might be having sex or praying to their Lord and you
may tease them in your selfishness.” (Ref same, Pg 261). It is possible that
Maududi had lost his mind. It is also possible that he has no idea of what he is
talking about. See Quran 36:51-52 above.
Imam Abu Hanifa’s Fiqh has
converted Islam into a frozen Hindu Shastra. (Tarjumanul Quran
1:136).
About Allama Sir Muhammad Iqbal: In reply to a
question regarding Sir Allama Iqbal’s critical view of questionable traditions,
Maududi sarcastically states, “In the presence of other scholars, there is no
need to know his views.” (Reference same, Pg 170).Allama Iqbal was a scholar par
excellence and one of the greatest exponents of the Quran through his
world-renowned poetry. Any scholarly work in Urdu ignoring the great Allama
speaks of the mental destitution of the writer. Also, he was a benefactor of
Maududi, providing the jobless Mullah with an opportunity to work at Pathankot.
Yet, we do not find a single reference to his sublime thoughts or top class
poetry in Maududi’s voluminous writings.
v
The more ancient the Mullah, the more authoritative he becomes. A dead Mullah also becomes more revered and
authoritative. The Quran warns against blind following of ancestors and equates
it with disbelief. (5:104 and many other verses).
Pre-emptive Divorce: The Mullah-in-Chief of the 20th century blindly follows the ancient
‘authorities’, e.g. Hanafi jurists: If a
man utters “divorce” three times even before marriage, the woman he weds will be
instantly divorced. (Reference same, Pg 188). How’s that?
Dear reader, these were just a few glimpses of
the brilliance of Maududi. Only space
limits us from presenting quite a few more gems. Let us finish with one
more:
Suckling On The Breasts Of
A Young Woman: This is a horrible Hadithi joke.
Bukhari writes that Hazrat Ayesha’s goat had eaten up the date-leaf upon which
were written two Quranic verses. This is supposed to have happened when there
was chaos at home because of the demise of the Prophet (S). One of those verses
was about stoning the ‘Sheikh and Sheikhah, a mature or married man and woman,
committing adultery. The other verse was about the grown-up men suckling on a
young woman.
The goat-eaten, non-existent, “Ten Sucklings
Verse” (the so-called Ayah
Ridha'at) is a horrible joke. The 'Imams' of Hadith report that Hazrat Ayesha
advised women of an 'easy' way to admit unrelated men into their privacy. Let
any grown up unrelated man suckle on the woman's breasts on ten different
occasions and lo and behold! He becomes a Mahram (one who is a family member and
can intrude into their privacy from then on). (Hadith 1934 Ibn Majah, 30:12
Malik’s Muwatta and Bukhari about the ‘criminal’ goat). About foster mothers,
the Quran clearly states:
4:23 The following women are
prohibited for you in marriage: Your … foster-mothers who have ever nursed you,
foster-sisters …
The verse is obviously talking
of babies and their foster mothers. Children become related to one another in a
solemn bond of brotherhood or sisterhood by nursing from a common woman. The
woman attains the honour of becoming their mother. According to Maududi, Imam
Hanbal says that suckling on a woman on three occasions will confer the bond of
suckling relationship on a child. But Imam Shafi’i differs saying that it has to
be five times. However, to an aesthetically sound mind the principle is quite
clear. But our jurists and Mullahs get entangled in silly disputes.
On Pg 338 Vol 1 of his Tafhim, Mullah Maududi
writes that although the jurists differ on the age of suckling, even if a grown
up man suckles on a woman, he will enter into the bond of suckling! But the
foolishness does not end here. Maududi asserts in Tarjumanul Quran that the
amount of milk actually swallowed is of terrible importance. How much milk?
Maududi frantically seeks help from Imam Abu Hanifa and Imam Malik and comes up
with a solution. Well, the amount is that which will be enough to break the fast
of a fasting person. However, the three Mullahs fail to elaborate how much milk
will be sufficient to break a fast. The Mullahs have neither the sense, nor the
courage to reject Ahadith that insult human intelligence, such as this one of a
grown up man suckling on a strange woman! Would the Mullahs advise this nonsense
to their wives, sisters and daughters? Who knows if Maududi did
that?
Ayatullah As-Syed Murtaza Hussain Nasir
Ferozabadi, the compiler of “Life Events of Seven Sahaba” happily accepts the
great insult but shows his ‘sensitivity’ by expressing his dismay on the
reported judgment of Hazrat Ayesha and Hanbal for neglecting an important issue:
“The man would have to handle the female breasts.” Maududi is least concerned
about it.
Oh, another question. What if a woman has no
milk? "Imam" Abu Yousuf said: Sucking at BOTH the dry breasts of a woman will
fulfil the Shari'ah law, provided it is done on ten different occasions.
(Gharaib fil Tahqiq-il-Mazahib Wa Tafhimul Masaail, Vol 2 Pg
137).
v
Dear reader, our Imams and Mullahs are in the habit of answering
questions that were never asked! In
fact, they invent hypothetical situations.
Here is news on 19 Sep 2007:
Al Azhar scholar favours adult
breastfeeding
Daily Times
Monitor
LAHORE: Al-Azhar University in
Cairo, the world’s leading Sunni university, reports: Sheikh Izzat Atiyaa has
issued the fatwa as a way around the prohibition in Islamic religious law
against a woman working in private premises with a man who was not her close
relative, says the report. Breastfeeding, he argued, would create a familial
relationship under Islamic law. Dr Atiyaa explained to the Egyptian newspaper
al-Watani al-Yawm that: “A man and a woman who are alone together are not
(necessarily) having sex but this possibility exists and breastfeeding provides
a solution to this problem (by) transforming the bestial relationship between
two people into a religious relationship based on (religious) duties.”
In Islamic tradition,
breastfeeding establishes a degree of familial relationship between the nurse
and the nursed even if there is no biological relationship. Dr Atiyaa argued in
his fatwa that if an adult male was nursed by a female co-worker it would
likewise establish a familial bond that would permit them to work side by side
without raising suspicion of illicit sex.
Dr Atiyaa headed al-Azhar
University’s department dealing with hadith. He said he had based his ruling on
one such tradition according to which, at the Prophet’s (peace be upon him)
order, a man named Salem was breastfed by the wife of another disciple. “The
fact that the hadith regarding the breastfeeding of an adult is inconceivable to
the mind does not make it invalid,” Dr Atiyaa said, in defending his ruling.
“Rejecting it is tantamount to questioning the Prophet’s (pbuh) tradition.”
Source:
www.ourbeacon.com
11:33 PM
Sultan Shahin
1 comments:
Where did Islam come from, and how did it develop its ideology? Find out by studying Islam's history online with the Historyscoper and see how deep the rabbit hole goes at http://go.to/islamhistory
Post a Comment