Pages

Wednesday, December 6, 2023

'Josh' Malihabadi: A Radical Poetic Genius

By Sumit Paul, New Age Islam 6 December 2023 Har Rang Mein Iblees Saza Deta Hai Insaan Ko Bahr-Taur Dagha Deta Hai Kar Sakte Nahin Gunaah Jo Ahmaq Un Ko Be-Rooh Namaazon Mein Laga Deta Hai -Josh Malihabadi (Satan punishes in every way/ He deceives humans in myriad manners/ Those fools who can't commit a sin/ He engages them in soulless prayers/Namaz) Ghunche, Teri Be-Basi Pe Dil Hilta Hai Sirf Ek Tabassum Ke Liye Khilta Hai Ghunche Ne Kaha Ki Iss Chaman Mein, Baaba Ye Ek Tabassum Bhi Kise Milta Hai -Josh Malihabadi (Oh bud, I shudder at your helplessness/ You bloom for just one smile/ The bud said, my dear, in such a garden/ Even this smile is not available to many) Mere Rone Ka Jis Mein Qissa Hai Umra Ka Behatareen Hissa Hai (The phase when I cried/ Is the best phase in my life) Insaan Ke Lahoo Ko Piyo, Izn-e-Aam Hai Angoor Ki Sharaab Ka Peena Haraam Hai (Drink the blood of humans, it's a general permission/ But drink the wine of grapes, it's religiously prohibited) ((December 5 is the Birth Anniversary of "Josh' Malihabadi)) Two random quatrains and a brace of couplets are woefully inadequate to fathom the poetic greatness of Shabbir Hasan Khan 'Josh' Malihabadi. The man wrote prolifically; he wrote over 100, 000 couplets and more than 1,000 Rubaiyaat (quatrains) in his lifetime. Known for his liberal values and challenging the established order, 'Josh' did total justice to his nom de plume and was full of ebullience and enthusiasm. He was a coeval of Raghupati Sahay 'Firaq' Gorakhpuri. A lifelong agnostic, Josh could never reconcile to the idea of an Islamic or Semitic god. "Zara Apni Aql Ka Istemaal Karo/ Door Aasmaan Pe Baithe Khuda Se Mat Daro" (Apply your intelligence a bit/ Don't be fearful of the god sitting far away in the sky). He penned this simple couplet at the age of 15 and true to his words, never cared much for a concocted god till he breathed his last at the age of 83 in 1982. "Bashar Ke Zehan Pe Qarnon Se Jo Musallat Hain/ Badal Raha Hoon Gumaanon Mein Un Yaqeenon Ko" (I'm changing the so-called beliefs into doubts that have eclipsed the minds of humans for ages). This Shayar-e-Inqilaab never compromised with his ideals and values. A streak of revolution continuously ran through the blood of this rebel poet. "Ho Chaahe Insaan Ya Koi Khuda/ Sar Kabhi Kisi Ke Aage Na Jhuka" (Whether man or god/ Never bow to anyone). But 'Josh' also wrote lovely romantic poetry: Suboot Hai Ye Muhabbat Ki Saada-Lohi Ka/ Jab Us Ne Vaada Kiya Hum Ne E'tibaar Kiya (This is the proof of love's naivete/ When she promised, I believed) or Kisi Ka Ahad-e-Jawani Mein Paarsa Hona/ Qasam Khuda Ki Ye Tauheen Hai Jawani Ki (When someone becomes a monk/mendicant/celibate at the zenith of youth/ It's an insult to youthfulness). This is really a very thought-stirring couplet from Josh's quill as all those misguided followers of Hinduism, Jainism, Buddhism and other faiths who become monks and mendicants- owing to some religious reasons- actually belittle the robustness of their youth. Yet, those nincompoops call it religious and spiritual duty! This couplet of 'Josh' will get you thinking: Tabassum Ki Saza Kitni Kadi Hai/ Gulon Ko Khil Ke Murjhana Pada Hai (The punishment of a smile is so severe/ Flowers have had to wither after blossoming). 'Josh' wrote brilliant prose. His Sarguzasht (autobiography) Yaadon Ki Baraat amply proves his mastery over this genre as well. The book is known for Josh's candour. He spared none and even mildly criticized Rabindranath Tagore for his artificiality and affected demeanour. 'Josh' Malihabadi will always be remembered for his poetic genius, radicalism and outspoken attitude. ----- A regular columnist for New Age Islam, Sumit Paul is a researcher in comparative religions, with special reference to Islam. He has contributed articles to the world's premier publications in several languages including Persian. URL: https://newageislam.com/spiritual-meditations/josh-malihabadi-radical-poetic-genius/d/131261 New Age Islam, Islam Online, Islamic Website, African Muslim News, Arab World News, South Asia News, Indian Muslim News, World Muslim News, Women in Islam, Islamic Feminism, Arab Women, Women In Arab, Islamophobia in America, Muslim Women in West, Islam Women and Feminism

Tuesday, December 5, 2023

Executions Have Always Been A Hush-Hush Business

By Sumit Paul, New Age Islam 5 December 2023 Kartar Singh and Ujagar Singh were not hanged. Their sentence was commuted to life imprisonment by the Supreme Court. By Ashok Sharma 03/12/2023 09:37:04 So Kartar and Ujagar were hanged to death on 9 October, 1983, while the two lovers who had planned it all, were spared. In fact, two years after the hanging, on 22 July 1985, the Delhi High Court accepted Dr. Jain and his lover's application that they had been punished enough by spending 16 years in jail.22 Nov 2019 "It was apparent that Kartar and Ujagar, who spent their time peacefully in jail, doing mundane work such as carpentry, knew why they had met their fate while the others had got away. In their late fifties, they told me, “If we had a good lawyer representing us, this wouldn't have happened.” The Delhi High Court ruled that the crime of the conspirators, Jain and Chandresh, was “at a lower plane” than the hitmen and enhanced their punishment “to be hanged by the neck till they are dead”. So Kartar and Ujagar were hanged to death on 9 October, 1983, while the two lovers who had planned it all, were spared. In fact, two years after the hanging, on 22 July 1985, the Delhi High Court accepted Dr. Jain and his lover’s application that they had been punished enough by spending 16 years in jail." Executed for 500 bucks: Tihar's Sorriest Hanging/ Sunil Gupta And Sunetra Choudhury/ The Asian Age/ Nov. 22, 2019 "Justice Kochchar was a visibly distressed man when he signed the black warrants for the two brothers" — Kartar and Ujagar Singh. "Kartar and Ujagar Singh | On October 9, 1983, contract killers Kartar and Ujagar Singh were executed for the murder of Vidya Jain in 1973. Curiously her husband and his friend, who hired the killer, were sentenced to life by the Delhi High Court. Ujagar and Kartar were sentenced to death." (India Today, Report: Munish Chandra Pandey, March 20, 2020) "About the ‘unfairest cut’. It was when we hanged Kartar and Ujagar Singh (for murdering the wife of President V.V. Giri’s eye surgeon Narendra Singh Jain; Jain had been having an affair with his secretary). They had charged only 500 rupees to kill Vidya Jain. After spending 10 years in jail, they were hanged. Jain and his paramour were spared. If you ask about the best-deserved one, I would say it was that of the Indira Gandhi assassins." Sunil Gupta, former jailer of Tihar, December 14, 2019. Deccan Chronicle Here, my point is not to prove that I'm right and the learned bureaucrat Mr Ashok Sharma is wrong. Hangings in India have been such a hush-hush business that it's indeed an uphill task to ascertain the exact numbers, reasons and facts related to them (hangings). This whole caboodle of carrying out executions is always very secretive. That's why the great French existentialist, Nobel laureate, atheist, humanitarian and moralist (yes, atheists are also moral beings!) Albert Camus wrote in his extended essay, ' Reflections on the guillotine ' that, ' Every execution, anywhere in the world, is a State's dubious and furtive action to eliminate an individual at an unearthly hour when the world is asleep.' Since hangings have not been documented, the number of people executed in India since independence in 1947 is a matter of dispute; official government statistics claim that only 57 people had been executed since independence. However, available information from other sources indicates that the official government figures are false, and the actual number of executions in India may run to several thousand. Research by the People's Union for Democratic Rights (PUDR) has located government records of 1,422 executions in 16 states in the decade from 1953 to 1963 alone. PUDR located this information in an appendix of the 35th report of the Fourth Law Commission in 1967. The National Law University Delhi compiled a list of persons executed in India since 1947 and found that at least 752 individuals had been executed, including the period from 1 January to 15 August 1947. Their report was compiled "as per responses received from Central prisons in India. Certain prisons have either provided information only for a limited period or refused to provide any information or did not have any records available." Therefore, the actual number of persons would be much more than 752. While information about the number of executions should be available with individual prison departments within each state, the government has been reluctant to share such information. For example, authorities in Kerala claimed that all records of executions had been destroyed by termites. Andhra Pradesh gave the same reason for not furnishing post-1968 records. Bihar claimed that the state did not maintain records of executions, while Tamil Nadu's Additional Director General of Police (Prisons) refused to provide any records at all. According to Alexander Jacob, Additional Director General of Police (Prisons) of Kerala, "nearly 50 people had been executed in Kerala in the post-Independence period". Rasha alias Raghuraj Singh, executed on 9 September 1947 at Jabalpur Central Jail, is presumed to be the first person executed in independent India. Akshay Thakur, Mukesh Singh, Pawan Gupta and Vinay Sharma, who were hanged on 20 March 2020, were the last persons to be executed in India. Rattan Bai Jain, executed on 3 January 1955 at Tihar Jail, is presumed to be the first woman executed in independent India (Courtesy, Wikipedia, List of People Executed in India). Take the example of Rattan Bai Jain, so far the only woman to be hanged after independence. Despite being documented as one of the 62 executed people in independent India, her name is often not mentioned in the text books of law in India. The issue of proper documentation of executions is everywhere vague and hazy. Even a country like America, where a few States haven't yet abolished capital punishment, is unable to provide a complete list of those executed over the years, nay centuries. Thousands of Indians were hanged by the Brits but The India House in England shows only 288 hangings. Though the papers in the archives show that Maharaja Nandkumar was the first Indian to be (unlawfully) executed (on the charge of graft!) by hanging on August 5, 1775 in Calcutta, Khadim Shaikh's execution is remarkably absent (or later removed). East India Company executed Khadim Shaikh in Bengal Province way back in 1777. He was executed by firing squad for killing an Englishman. It was arguably the first (and only?) execution by firing squad in India though Indian laws also allow a death-row convict to be shot dead by a firing squad. This is however allowed in limited circumstances and can be carried out only by the Army, the Navy and the Air Force. It's, therefore, in the fitness of things that death rap and all corporal punishments must be abolished not just in India but all over the world. Humans have no right to call themselves civilized so long as even an insignificant, tiny island in the back of beyond continues to execute people in the name of justice. ----- A regular columnist for New Age Islam, Sumit Paul is a researcher in comparative religions, with special reference to Islam. He has contributed articles to the world's premier publications in several languages including Persian. URL: https://newageislam.com/spiritual-meditations/executions-hush-hush-business/d/131255 New Age Islam, Islam Online, Islamic Website, African Muslim News, Arab World News, South Asia News, Indian Muslim News, World Muslim News, Women in Islam, Islamic Feminism, Arab Women, Women In Arab, Islamophobia in America, Muslim Women in West, Islam Women and Feminism

Monday, December 4, 2023

Ten Thousand Goats To Be Sacrificed For A Tribal Deity!

By Sumit Paul, New Age Islam 4 December 2023 "Slaughtered animals ask God, "We expected love, care and protection from you as you're called the Merciful. But why did we get such a painful death? I'm curious how God will react." Maulana Rumi Photo: Bar and Bench ------ A division bench of the Calcutta High Court on Friday, December 2, refused to intervene over a petition filed against the religious programme involving sacrifice of 10, 000 goats on the occasion of Kali Puja at Bolla village in South Dinajpur district, West Bengal. Refusing to intervene in the matter, the division bench of Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam and Justice Hirnamay Bhattacharya observed that since the faith of several people are involved with the matter the court cannot intervene in the matter. https://clarionindia.net/calcutta-hc-refuses-to-intervene-in-kali-puja-involving-sacrifice-of-10000-goats/ Not one or two, but 10, 000 goats to be sacrificed for a tribal deity ! Yet, Hindus have the gall to condemn the sacrifice of animals on the occasion of Bakrid. Agreed, what ignorant Muslims do on Bakrid must be stopped because no Allah, if at all it does exist, will be happy to receive such ghastly offerings in the name of a hoary-old religious custom. But equally macabre is this custom of Hindus in which a fierce-looking goddess, belonging to a subaltern society, feels good to have the flesh and meat of poor and innocent animals. Shouldn't this gory practice be banned forthwith? To hell with the faith and belief of primitive and god-fearing followers. What's reprehensible must be condemned in no uncertain terms. That this is happening in West Bengal, a relatively advanced state with a large number of 'rational' and 'educated' people is all the more shocking. How can followers eat the meat of bleating goats, sacrificed to placate a dreadful deity having an appearance that can give nightmares to those who're lily-livered? Are they so heartless and insensitive? I'm really baffled. This faith business is so strong that even the law of the land is helpless. Remember, a few years ago, the current CJI, Dr Chandrachud ruled in favour of women, whether menstruating or not, wanting to visit Sabrimala Temple in South India. But other judges, devotees (including women) and temple management vetoed the decision. Sabrimala is still closed for all. Masses are asses when it comes to religions, customs, gods and all that garbage. It's time to think rationally. But do the benighted people even have a smidgen of reason and vision? This is a million-dollar question. Isn't it? ----- A regular columnist for New Age Islam, Sumit Paul is a researcher in comparative religions, with special reference to Islam. He has contributed articles to the world's premier publications in several languages including Persian. URL: https://newageislam.com/spiritual-meditations/goats-sacrificed-tribal-deity/d/131246 New Age Islam, Islam Online, Islamic Website, African Muslim News, Arab World News, South Asia News, Indian Muslim News, World Muslim News, Women in Islam, Islamic Feminism, Arab Women, Women In Arab, Islamophobia in America, Muslim Women in West, Islam Women and Feminism

Umar Al Farooq - The Great Caliph - Concluding Part: Practicing Compassion With The Impoverished

By Moin Qazi, New Age Islam 4 December 2023 Amongst the nations before your time, there have been inspired people(who were not Prophets), and if there is one amongst my Ummah, he is Umar - Prophet Muhammad Practicing Compassion With The Impoverished Here are a few episodes from Umar’s life that give us glimpses of the compassion of this great exemplar of justice. Umar Cooks And Feeds A Starving Family During one of his nocturnal rounds with his aide, Caliph Umar heard a plaintive wail waft out of a small, humble dwelling. The alarmed Umar immediately headed towards it. He gently tapped the door. Pushing aside the curtain, he peeped in and found a lean woman cooking meals. She was surrounded by her brood of wailing children who appeared to be extremely hungry. The woman was desperately trying to calm down her unrelenting children. A pan was boiling on the fire. When Umar enquired about the reason for the children’s distress, the woman said they had been starving for the whole day. “And what are you cooking” asked Umar. The woman said that there was only water and stones in the kettle. She was trying to console them with the impression that she was cooking food. Umar was torn with guilt. He believed that in his rule, the people were being governed well. He was appalled and astonished at the plight of his citizens, and he appeared dismayed with his administration. Umar went straight to the state treasury. He called for a sack of rice, loaded it on his back, and weighed down with this heavy load, trudged through the streets. On his way, he chanced to meet a Muslim man who, recognizing him, said: ‘Caliph, let me carry your burden.’ The Caliph replied: ‘No, for who will carry the burden of my sins when I meet my Lord?’ Umar arrived at the woman’s house and, knocking at the door, went in. The children had not yet gone to sleep. They were still crying. Umar made bread with his own hands and cooked some food. He offered bread and food to the children. The children were so hungry that they scraped the plate clean to the last crumbs before they went to sleep. Umar asked the woman why she had not complained to the Caliph. The woman said that despite her poverty, she had some self-respect and believed she should not go and beg the Caliph for any favour. Umar was visibly moved. “You are right. I offer my apologies. For the future, it will be my responsibility to see that every individual of my kingdom can lead a decent life.” After making sure that all was well in the house, Umar left. When the woman realized that the man who had come to her relief was the Caliph himself, she was overwhelmed and smacked her forehead, amazed at the humility of such a powerful ruler. “No Caliph can be so humble and noble,” she exclaimed in gratitude as she inconsolably invoked Lord’s blessings for him. Humility At Its Zenith During his travels, Umar would take no tent but throw his gown over a low bush and lie down in the shade. He performed the pilgrimage nine times during his caliphate. Piety, abstinence, and downright simplicity were the hallmarks of his character. “His walking stick,” wrote one Muslim historian,” struck more terror in those who were present than another man’s sword.” He would spend several nights visiting townships and going about the streets of Madinah to find out if anyone needed help or assistance. The general social and moral tone of Muslim society at that time is well illustrated by the words of an Egyptian who was sent to spy on the Muslims during their Egyptian campaign. He reported: “I have seen people, every one of whom loves death more than he loves life. They cultivate humility rather than pride. None is given to material ambitions. Their mode of living is simple. Their commander is their equal. They make no distinction between superior and inferior, between master and slave. When the time of prayer approaches, none remains behind…” Al-Awza’i once narrated: “Umar came out in the depths of the night and was sighted by Talha, a renowned Companion of the Prophet. ‘Umar went and entered a house and then entered another one. The following morning, Talha went to this house, where he saw a blind, disabled old lady. He said to her, ‘Why does this man come to you?’ She said, ‘he has taken care of me since such and such. He comes, helps me with what is good for me, and takes away the harm.’ Talha said, ‘O Talha, may your mother be bereft. Are you following the slips of ‘Umar?’” (The Virtues of ‘Umar ibn Al-Khattab, by Ibn al-Jawzi, p. 68) Justice On Display Once Umar purchased a horse from a Bedouin. However, after traveling some distance, Umar noticed an infirmity in the horse. He rode back to the seller requesting him to take it back since it was defective. The man grinned and was annoyed. He refused to take it back because the horse was alright at the time of the transaction. “How come this issue has cropped up after I have already sold the animal and the transaction is complete.” Umar was taken aback by the seller’s stand. He had not anticipated this response. He decided to refer the matter to an arbitrator. He suggested that the man identify a judge to whom they could direct their dispute. The man chose Shurayh bin Al-Haarith Al-Kindi and Umar accepted his choice. After the judge had heard the Bedouin’s testimony, he turned to Umar, asking: “Was the horse normal when you bought it?” `Umar replied: “Yes, it was.”Shurayh pronounced: “Then keep what you bought or return it as you took.” Umar looked at Shurayh, was overwhelmed and exclaimed: “Thus justice should be - statement, distinguishing words and fair justice… I give you the position of Chief Justice of Kufah in Iraq.” Umar did not insist on his choice of a judge or threaten or even influence the judge. Umar accepted the judgment with humility. There was no trace of bitterness or hatred in him. The Power Of Piety Umar once presided over a packed courthouse when he noticed two men dragging a boy inside. Seeing the commotion, he enquired what about the matter. The men said the boy had killed their father. Umar questioned the boy about the charge. The boy admitted that he had killed their father, but he said it was accidental and not deliberate. “My camel used to graze on their property. One day their father hit a rock at the camel, which struck its eye. Seeing the pain and suffering of the camel, I got infuriated and threw a stone at their father, who hit his head and killed him.” Umar then asked the two men if they would forgive the boy. They said they wanted retribution, meaning the boy had to be executed for expiation. Umar then asked the boy if he had any last request or desire before the punishment was carried out. The boy said his father had passed away and had a young brother. His father had left some money for him, and he would require three days to retrieve the hidden money and hand it over to his brother. Umar then asked if he could produce a guarantor to assure that he would return. The boy looked at the packed courthouse for sympathy but received no response. The people looked the other way, to his utter surprise when he cast a hopeful glance at them. Then suddenly, a hand in the last row went up. Abū Dhar al-Ghifari al-Kinani, the illustrious companion (sahabah) of the Prophet, was the fourth or fifth individual to embrace Islam. “I am consenting to come forward to stand guarantee for the poor hapless boy.”It meant that in case the boy did not turn up in three days, Abu Dhar would have to get his head chopped off. The boy was allowed to leave and report back within three days. The first day passed, but the boy was not seen. The second day too passed with the boy still not back. On the third day, the two men went to Abu Dhar and asked him to accompany them to the courthouse. Abu Dhar insisted that there was still time till the day to end. The prayer call for sunset prayers was still minutes away. Meanwhile, tension had built up in Madinah, and the town was abuzz with news that Abu Dhar would have to suffer the punishment for the boy. The boy appeared with just a few minutes to go for the prayer call. He was gasping but relieved that he could make it by the deadline. Umar asked the boy what prompted him to return when he had not sent any spy or an escort to follow him. He said he didn’t want people to say that a Muslim had made a vow and failed to fulfil it. He then turned to Abu Dhar and asked him what had made him stand guarantee for the boy, mainly when the risk involved was so high and the boy was a total stranger. Abu Dhar replied that he didn’t want anybody to say that a Muslim wanted a guarantee, and no Muslim was forthcoming to offer it. The two men whose father had been killed by the boy turned emotional. “When there are such honest and pious people in this world, we don’t want people to say that a Muslim asked for forgiveness and was not forgiven. We would like to forgive the boy.” The boy was forgiven and allowed to go free. Such was the level of piety during the caliphate of Umar. The Piety Of A Poor Boy The great thinker Al Ghazali records an incident in the life of Caliph Umar. Abdullah Ibn Dinar relates that the Caliph was traveling from Madinah to Makkah. On his way one morning, he noticed a flock of sheep at the base of a hillock. A Negro boy, who was a slave of a shepherd, was leading the flock. During his travels, Umar would always talk to village inhabitants to ascertain their standard of piety and character, as it would help him understand the spiritual health of the kingdom. He asked the boy if he could sell him one sheep. The boy answered an emphatic no without batting his eyelids or pausing for even a moment. “But why?” asked the Caliph. Because the flock belonged to the owner, and he was just a labourer doing his job to earn his bread. “It is my master’s and I am his slave!” “What’s wrong with selling it?” asked the Caliph with his eyes fixed on the boy's innocent face. “Take this money and give that sheep to me and go and tell your master that a wolf snatched away his sheep.” The words chilled the boy. He was appalled and shocked at the perfidious suggestion. He was susceptible to the divine retribution that would befall him for the evil act. He stared hard at the Caliph and eyed him with deep suspicion. The poor fellow did not know whom he was staring at. He gazed at the crest of the hill, and it conjured in his mind the sight of his master. His tone changed and became tougher. “I can cheat my master over there on the other side of the hill. But can I deceive that Great Master who is seeing both of us and listening to our entire conversation?” the boy exploded. Umar could not hold back his tears when he heard this answer from the boy and remembered the Qur’anic verse: “We verily created man and We know what his soul whispereth to him, and We are nearer to him than his jugular vein.” (Q50:16) Tenderly he asked the boy to lead him to his world master, the owner of the flock. On meeting him the Caliph enquired how much he had paid for this slave.” So much,” replied the owner! “Here is that much, take it and set the boy free,” said Umar. What an immense satisfaction Umar must have derived from this profound experience. He paid the amount and freed the boy. He said to him, “This word freed you in this life and I hope it will free you in the Hereafter.” (Al-Ghazali, Ihya’ vol. 4, p. 396) The boy was illiterate and had never read the Qur’an. But he was aware of its teachings and the grave implications of dishonesty. A believer must always consider this question, “Where is God?” God is not far away; God is not at a distance. God is not unaware of what we do. God knows everything and He sees everything. The more we have this faith in our hearts and minds, the more we will do the right deeds and the more we will be at peace with ourselves and others. As the Qur’an says, “We verily created a man and We know what his soul whispereth to him, and We are nearer to him than his jugular vein.” No Substitute For Good People In one of the homes of Madinah, Umar was sitting with a group of his Companions. He asked them, “Make a wish. What is your greatest wish in this world?” One of them replied, “I wish to have as much gold as would fill this whole house so that I could spend it all for the sake of Allah.” Umar did not give much attention to this response and then again asked another Companion to Make a wish. What is your dearest wish in this world?” The Companion said, “I wish this house was full of jewels and pearls so that I could spend it all for the sake of Allah.” Yet again, Umar did not give much attention to this reply and asked for the third time, “Make a wish! What is your greatest wish?” Frustrated, his Companions said, “We don’t know what to say (what do you mean), O leader of the believers.” Thereupon Umar replied: “I wish this house was full of men, like Abu ‘Ubaydah Ibn Al-Jarraah, Mu’aadh ibn Jabal and Saalim who worked for Abu Hudhayfah (names of some of the Companions who died in the service of Islam) to use them to spread the word of Allah.” Umar understood the value of people who had a sense of mission and purpose. Men and women who will carry the banner of Islam, be bearers of the message and be unwavering in their dedication and commitment to moving Islam forward. Because no amount of gold or silver can replace people, no amount of money can replace “among the believers (those who) are true to what they have promised (to) Allah [...]” (Q 33:23). He also made the same point when he sent Abdullah ibn Mas’ud to the people of Kufa to teach them. He said to them, “I have given preference to you over myself in sending Abdullah to you.” Religious Tolerance The greatness of Caliph Umar is apparent from his sympathetic treatment of his non-Muslim subjects. Before the advent of Islam, the rights of other races in the Roman and Persian Empires were worse than those of slaves. Even the Syrian Christians had no right over their lands, so much so that with transfer of their lands they were also transferred. When Umar conquered these countries, he returned the lands to their tillers who were mostly non-Muslims. According to Imam Shafi, once when a Muslim murdered a Christian, he was brought to the notice, who allowed the heirs of the Christian to avenge the murder and the Muslim was beheaded. He consulted non-Muslims in State matters. Their voice carried much weight in the handling of affairs concerning them. The Caliph had been too indulgent to non-Muslims and even pardoned their treasons which no present-day civilized government could tolerate. These unusual sympathies of the conquerors so much moved the non-Muslims that they sided with them in preference to their co-religionists. The Christians and Jews of Hems prayed for the return of Muslims. The Caliph, no doubt, imposed Jizyah, a protection tax on the non-Muslims but such tax was not realised by those non-Muslims who joined the Muslim army. Abu Ubayda, the Commander-in-Chief of Muslim forces in Syria, returned the Jizyah realised from the inhabitants of Hems when he had to withdraw his garrison from Hems due to an emergency. Therefore, he could not undertake the responsibility of their protection. The people of Jarjema refused to pay the Jizyah because they had enlisted in the Muslim army. He demonstrated justice in defining the rights and privileges of non-Muslims, an example of which is the next contract with the Christians of Jerusalem: “This is the protection the servant of God, ‘Umar, the Ruler of the Believers, has granted to the people of Eiliya [Jerusalem]. The protection is for their lives and properties, churches and crosses, sick and healthy, and co-religionists. Their churches shall not be used for habitation, nor shall they be demolished, nor shall any injury be done to them or their compounds, or their crosses, nor shall their properties be injured. There shall be no compulsion for these people in religion, nor shall any of them suffer any injury on account of religion…Whatever is written herein is under the covenant of God and the responsibility of His Messenger, of the Caliphs and the believers, and shall hold good as long as they pay Jizyah [the tax for their defence] imposed on them.” Those non-Muslims who took part in defence with the Muslims were exempted from paying Jizyah, and when the Muslims had to retreat from a city whose non-Muslim citizens had paid this tax for their defence, the tax was returned to the non-Muslims. The public treasury and the zakat funds provided the old, poor, and disabled of Muslims and non-Muslims alike. Non-Muslims did not perform military duty; instead, they paid tribute. They were given jurisdiction over their canon law, which was a sort of partial autonomy. Those who took part in the defense of the Islamic State were exempted from paying jizyah. If the Muslim army had to retreat from a city whose non-Muslim citizens had paid their tax for their defence, the tax was duly returned to them. The tale of the Christian tribe of Banu Taghlib (Christian Arabs) is remarkable in this respect. The Muslim commander Waleed pressed them to abjure their faith. Umar was displeased with his actions and instructed: “Leave them in the profession of the gospel.” The tribe sent a delegation to Umar to request that they be allowed to pay double the zakat (Sadaqah) or Ushar, instead of the poll tax as they were too proud to pay the taxation of the ‘uncircumcised. ‘The Caliph allowed them to pay double the amount of zakat and that they not christen their children. Umar’s Strictness With Family What was especially astonishing about Umar was his integrity. It is a weakness that bleeds the most astute statesman into an empty shell if unchecked. He issued strict orders that no family member should accept any gift. Hence Umar found a new carpet with his wife Atika. He wanted to know from where the carpet had come. She said that it had been presented by Abu Musa Ashari, the Governor of Basra. Umar had the carpet immediately returned to Abu Musa. Abu Musa was reprimanded in strong terms for sending a gift to the wife of the Caliph. ‘Abdullah, the son of Umar, purchased some camels. They were lean and were bought at a very cheap price. ‘Abdullah sent these camels to the state pasture where they were fattened. These were then sold in the market and fetched a high price. When this was brought to the notice of Umar, he ordered that as the camels had been fed at the state pasture, whatever profit had accrued in the sale of the camels should be deposited in the state treasury. Once Umar saw a small girl who was lean, thin, and emaciated. Umar enquired who the girl was. ‘Abdullah the son of Umar, said that she was his daughter and that she had lost weight because with the allowance that Umar allowed to his family, nourishing food could not be provided. Umar said he was giving them what he gave to other families and he could not give his family anything more than what he did to other families. Once ‘Abdullah and ‘Ubaidullah, two sons of Umar, went to Basra. There they obtained a loan from Abu Musa on the condition that the amount would be paid to the state treasury at Madinah. With this amount, they purchased some merchandise and sold it at Madinah. They earned a considerable profit, which they kept for themselves and credited the principal amount in the state treasury. When Umar knew of this transaction, he wanted his sons to credit the entire profit to the state treasury as the money with which they had traded state money. ‘Abdullah kept quiet but ‘Ubaidullah protested. He said that if there had been a loss, the state would not have shared it. Umar stuck to his decision, but ‘Ubaidullah protested again. Some other Companions intervened and decided it should be treated as a partnership case. Umar allowed his sons to retain half of the profit and deposit the other half in the state treasury. Once Umar received a considerable quantity of musk. It had to be weighed and then distributed. Umar was searching for a person who could weigh musk with meticulous care. Atika, the wife of Umar, offered to do so as she was an expert in the job. Umar did not accept the offer on the ground that when she weighed and distributed it, some musk would be attached to her hands and clothes, which would be a misappropriation of in-state property. Once Umm Kulthum, a wife of Umar, purchased perfume for one dirham and sent it as a gift to the Byzantine empress. The Byzantine empress returned the empty vials of perfume filled with gems. When Umar came to know of this, he sold the jewels. Out of the sale proceeds, he handed over one dirham to his wife and the rest was deposited in the state treasury. Once some gifts were received in the Baitul Mal. Hafsa waited on Umar and wanted a share. Umar said: “Dear, you have a share in my personal property, but I cannot give you a special share out of the property that belongs to the Muslims as a whole. You can get only what other Muslims get.” His son-in-law once waited on him and wanted some assistance from the Baitul Mal. Umar paid him some money from his own pocket and did not give him anything from the Baitul Mal. Once after distribution, a lady's scarf was found surplus. The custodian of the Baitul Mal suggested that this might be offered to Umm Kulthum, the wife of Umar. Umar said: “No. Present it to Umm Salit, the lady who carried the water skin on her back on the day of the battle of Uhud to distribute water among the Muslim warriors.” Once after accounting, one dirham was found surplus in the Baitul Mal. The treasurer gave the dirham to a small son of Umar. When Umar came to know of that he had the dirham returned immediately. ‘Abdullah, a son of Umar fought in the battle of Jalaula. He got his share of the spoils and sold it on the spot. This fetched a high value. When Umar came to know of that, he said that he was allowed the high price because people thought that he was the Caliph’s son. He ordered that the profit earned beyond the market value should be credited to the state treasury. One of the sons of Umar drank wine inadvertently in Egypt. He submitted himself voluntarily to the punishment of 80 stripes in Egypt. Umar was not satisfied. He called the boy to Madinah and flogged him to death. When the boy was on his death bed, Umar said to him, “When you meet the Holy Prophet tell him that Umar is following his injunctions strictly.” It is not a private matter for individuals but is both private and public. It permeates the whole fabric of society and covers not only ritual, belief and ethics, but is also a detailed code of conduct covering every aspect of life, art and politics, hygiene, dress and diet. The archangel Gabriel asked Muhammad about three increasingly higher and deeper levels of religiosity. The Prophet answered sequentially as Islam (whole-hearted submission to God), Faith and, lastly, Loveliness (ihsan). This third quality the Prophet identified as worshipping God as if we could see the Divine, and if we cannot, to always remember that God nevertheless sees us. The sequence is fascinating, as it reveals that what we think of as Islam (the attestation to Divine Unity, the performance of the prayers, the pilgrimage to Makkah, the paying of the alms tax, the fast of Ramadan, mark only the very first layer - though the foundational layer - of religiosity. Above that is faith, and above is the spiritual and mystical layer of spiritual beauty, for Ihsan is the realm of actualizing and realizing beauty and loveliness (Husn), bringing beauty into this world and connecting it to God, who is the All-Beautiful. Throughout Islamic history, this realm of Ihsan was most emphatically pursued by the mystics of Islam, the Sufis. Historically, this mystical realm of Islam formed a powerful companion to the legal dimension of Islam (Shari’a). Indeed, many of the mystics of Islam were also masters of legal and theological realms. The cultivation of inward beauty and outward righteous action was linked in many of important Islamic institutions. In comparing Islam with Judaism, the mystical dimension of Islam was much more prominently widespread than Kabbalah. And unlike the Christian tradition, the mysticism of Islam was not cloistered in monasteries. Sufis were - and remain - social and political agents who went about seeking the Divine in the very midst of humanity. Here are a few episodes from Umar’s life that give us glimpses of the nobility of this great exemplar of justice. Umar Picks A Milkmaid As A Daughter In Law Caliph Umar used to sneak out of his palace at night to mingle, in disguise, with ordinary people and learn what they were thinking. One night, Umar moved through his capital with aide Ibn Abbas. They walked from one settlement to another till they came to a locality inhabited by impoverished families. While passing by a small hutment, Umar overheard a quarrel in a house, and he could guess that trouble was brewing inside. He stopped and overheard the conversation. The mother was insisting that her daughter adulterate the milk by adding water. She said the money they earned by selling their milk was not enough to sustain them. She recounted that when she was young, she would add water to milk to boost her profits. She insisted that it was the only way they could increase their income. The girl was taken aback at her mother’s arrogance. She balked at this preposterous suggestion and retorted: “that was when you were not a Muslim. Now that we are Muslims, we cannot do it. Dishonesty is a heinous offense.” The mother stood unmoved and was in no mood to relent. She stuck to her stand, saying Islam did not prevent her from doing business the way she wanted. The daughter was equally determined and stood her ground. She tried her best to dissuade her mother from this evil plan. “Have you forgotten the Caliph’s order? He has prohibited selling milk mixed with water.” The mother was stubborn. “But the Caliph does not know us; we are so poor, how else can we earn our bread?” The daughter was annoyed. “I cannot practice deception. This income will be unlawful. It will violate the Caliph’s mandate, I can’t think of such dishonesty.” The mother tried to counsel her, “But how will the Caliph or any of his officers know about it. You are foolish; you do not know how to do business. From tomorrow I will manage it by myself. I do not need you anymore.” The girl remained stubborn. “But remember, I will not allow you to do it. I will respect my conscience and will resist your bad intentions. I can’t be dishonest to my Caliph. He may not come to know of this dishonesty, but have you ever thought about Allah who has His eyes on every speck of the earth?” Sensing the rebellious mood of her daughter, the enraged mother put off the discussion. She turned off the lamp and both went to sleep. Umar spent a restless night mulling over the daughter’s conversation with her mother and was heady with the feeling of his people's high level of piety. In the morning, Umar sent his attendant to purchase milk from the girl. To Umar’s utter disbelief, the milk was pure. The girl had kept up her resolve. Umar was overwhelmed with the girl’s virtuousness. Tears rolled down his eyes at this rare display of honesty. Umar turned to his colleague and sighed with a heavy heart. “The girl has defied her mother for the sake of Allah. I recommend a reward for her?” “We can reward her with cash” replied Ibn Abbas. Umar found it too inappropriate for such a great virtue. “Such a girl would become a great mother. Her honesty cannot be weighed in a few coins. I shall offer her a reward truly befitting her.” The Caliph invited the daughter and the mother to his court. The mother trembled as she stood before the mighty ruler, wondering why they had been summoned. But the girl faced the Caliph confidently and with great equanimity. There was an impressive dignity about her. Umar narrated the entire episode to the audience. He recounted how he had overheard the conversation between the mother and the daughter and how the daughter remained truthful to the commandments of Allah. Someone suggested that the mother be tasked with misguiding the daughter. The Caliph remarked that ordinarily, he would have upbraided the mother, but he had forgiven her for the sake of her daughter. Turning to the girl, the Caliph said: “Islam needs daughters like you, and as a Caliph of Islam, I feel the best reward I can give you is to own you as a daughter”. The Caliph called his sons, and addressing them. He said: “Here is a gem of a girl who would make a great mother. My cherished desire is that one of you should take this girl in wedlock. I cannot think of a better wife than this girl with such sterling character. In matters of wedlock, it should be the character, and not worldly status, that should count.” Abdullah and Abdur Rahman, the elder sons of the Caliph, were already married. Asim, the third son was still unmarried. He immediately accepted Umar’s offer. With the consent of the milkmaid mother, the marriage was solemnized and the girl became the daughter-in-law of the legendary Caliph. From this union was born a daughter, Umm Asim, who later became the mother of Umar bin Abdul Aziz. Umar bin Abdul Aziz became a Caliph. Historians consider him one of the greatest caliphs in the history of Islamic rule. While other caliphs of the Umayyad dynasty revelled in luxury, Umar bin Abdul Aziz followed in Umar’s footsteps. It is said that if ever there was a noble caliph after the ‘rightly guided Caliphs’, it was Umar bin, Abdul Aziz. By his discerning choice of the milkmaid as his daughter-in-law, the Caliph had unknowingly laid the foundation of a great and noble dynasty. We need great mothers if we are to build great nations. Umar’s Wife Acts As A Midwife One night, Umar saw a Bedouin sitting outside a tent. As Umar approached him, he heard a groaning sound coming from the tent. Upon inquiry, the man remarked that he was a desert-dweller and his wife was in labour. He had come to Madinah to seek help from the Commander of the Faithful - a title for the Caliph. Umar asked him to relax and leave all his worries to him. The Bedouin was in a daze about the man's identity but was nevertheless at peace with himself.” Don’t worry, God has answered our prayers,” he comforted his wife, who was groaning in pain. Meanwhile, Umar promptly went home and shared the problem with his wife, Umm Kulthum, who readily offered to accompany him to the tent. She packed food and they soon reached the tent. Umm Kulthum assisted the woman in labour while Umar made a fire and began cooking a meal for them. After some time, Umm Kulthum cheerfully announced, “O Commander of the Faithful! Congratulate your guest on the birth of a son.” The Bedouin was flabbergasted. And in the lady’s words, he got a confirmation of the identity of the Caliph. He was transfixed in disbelief. He blessed him in an obsequious tone, turning to Umar, “I am overwhelmed with your benevolence.” He broke down. Umar held him and extolled God’s mercy, “I thank God that I was able to serve you. Come to me in the morning and I will find ways to help you further.” “God is praised,” the Bedouin remarked, “I came to seek Umar and God sent Umar to seek me.” The man’s amazement would have been redoubled had he known that the lady who handled the entire midwifery, Umm Kulthum, was the daughter of Fatimah and granddaughter of the Prophet. A Responsible Ruler On one occasion, Umar was walking through the capital when he heard loud and boisterous noises of revelry. Rude songs were being sung in a house. An angry Umar jumped into the house through the chimney. A man and a woman, who, Umar knew, were not married, were drinking and amusing themselves. Umar was furious and wild with rage. He yelled at them: “Do you not fear God that you can commit such great sins?” The man showed no shame as he remorselessly rattled off a volley of accusations at Umar. “Calm yourself please, O ‘Umar! We confess we have sinned, but, what about you; you have committed three. God prohibited spying on people’s sins, but you spied. God commanded that people must enter houses through their doors but you jumped in through the chimney. God commanded that people must greet the house dwellers when they enter, but you didn’t greet us. The rules that apply to us are meant for you as well. Do you intend to tell us that a Caliph can do no wrong?” There was a note of scorn in the man’s voice. The answer jolted and enraged Umar who could not apprehend this mood of defiance. Umar went pink on his face. But his sense of restraint prevailed. His senses didn’t desert him in his anger. He regained his calm. Umar masked his anger and preferred silence because, as a wise and mature ruler, he knew that silence has its grace, just as speech could be, at times, graceless and ugly. Umar immediately left the house without uttering a word. The couple had transgressed decency limits and surely deserved a heavy punishment for their obscene acts. But Umar was conscious of his folly. Justice had to be fair and beyond reproach. Umar decided to close the matter and not pursue it any further. Several months after that incident, Umar happened to cross that man. Umar remembered the whole incident, but he greeted the man usually and quipped: “Believe me! I have not told anyone of what I witnessed months ago”. The man, too, responded politely: “Believe me! I have never committed that sin again”. As a caliph, Umar could have surely avenged his insult. But he bore it patiently. But the man who offended him was overwhelmed by the caliph’s response to the incident. He recoiled and immediately reformed himself. This incident demonstrated the fairness of Umar’s actions with his citizens. Supplementary Reading al-Baladhuri. Ahmad bin Yahya Futuh al-Buldan (Conquests of Nations). al-Qarashi, Ghalib A.K. Awliyat al-Farooq fi al-Idara wal-Qada (Firsts of the Farooq in Administration and Judicial affairs), being a Ph.D. thesis, Muasast al-Kutub al-Thaqafiyah, Beirut, 1990. al-Tabari, Muhammad bin Jarir Ta’rikh al-rusul wa’l Muluk (History of the Prophets and Kings), 10 Vols. Ed. Muhammad Abulfadl Ibrahim. Dar Suywdan, Beirut, copy of the Dar al-Ma’raf, Cairo 2nd edition, 1960-69. Arnold, Thomas W. The Caliphate, Barnes and Noble, New York, 1966. as-Suyuti, Jalal ad-Din The History of the Khalifahs who took the right way, being a portion of as-Suyuti’s tarikh al-Khulafah, translated by: A. Clarke, TaHa Publishers, London, 1995. Blankinship, Khalid Y. The History of al-Tabari, Volume XI: The Challenge to the Empires, Translated by: State University of New York Press, 1993. Donner, Fred M. The Early Islamic Conquests, Princeton University Press, 1981. Jandora, John W. The March from Medina, A Revisionist Study of the Arab Conquests, The Kingston Press, Clifton, 1990. Khatab, Mahmoud S. Bayan al-Aqeedah Wal-Qayidah (Between Creed and Leadership) Dar El-Fikr, Beirut, n.d. Nu’mani, Shibli Al-Farooq, The Life of Omar the Great, Translated from the original Urdu by Zafar Ali Khan, International Islamic Publishers, New Delhi, 1992. ----- Moin Qazi is the author of the bestselling book, Village Diary of a Heretic Banker. He has worked in the development finance sector for almost four decades. Other Parts of the Article: Umar Al Farooq - The Great Caliph - Part One: Timeline Of The Life Of Caliph Umar Umar Al Farooq - The Great Caliph - Part Two: Glimpses Of The Biography That Shaped His Destiny As Well As That Of Islam Umar Al Farooq - The Great Caliph - Part Three: A Paragon Of Nobility Umar Al Farooq - The Great Caliph - Part Four: A Pioneering Reformer Umar Al Farooq - The Great Caliph - Part Five: The Great Conqueror Umar Al Farooq - The Great Caliph - Part Six: A Moral Innovator URL: https://newageislam.com/books-documents/umar-farooq-caliph-practicing-compassion/d/131247 New Age Islam, Islam Online, Islamic Website, African Muslim News, Arab World News, South Asia News, Indian Muslim News, World Muslim News, Women in Islam, Islamic Feminism, Arab Women, Women In Arab, Islamophobia in America, Muslim Women in West, Islam Women and Feminism

Reform Colonial Islamic Law To Reflect Modern Realities

By Grace Mubashir, New Age Islam 2 December 2023 Muslims Should Come Forward To Reform Islamic Law Which Was Shaped During Colonial Times. While India Is Moving Away From Its Colonial Legacy, Muslims Should Adequately Reform To Reflect Modern Realities Main Points: 1. By the end of the nineteenth century, the scope of Islamic law was limited to the private sphere of the family/individual. 2. In the Shah Bano case, Rajiv Gandhi's government overturned the Supre Court's decision, thus squashing an important chance to reform Islamic law according to modern needs 3. It's high time for Muslim leadership to think about ways to free away from colonial laws to modernity. 4. Many Arab countries and progressive Muslim laws in Muslim countries show the way. ----- India was the first Muslim territory conquered by the British. Therefore, the British saw India as a testing ground for bringing the Muslims under control. Later, it can be seen that the British implemented the rule in the African-Malayan regions where the Muslim rule came under the British Empire by following the Indian model. The East India Company began its rule in the Indian subcontinent through the Diwani status that the East India Company received after the Plassey War. Till then the limits of their laws were confined within their forts. With the grant of Diwani status, taxation and justice in the province of Bengal came under the purview of the East India Company. The British initially tried to rely on the legal system of the Mughal era as the power was transferred from the Mughal dynasty. To that end, the Qadhis, the traditional legal experts who implemented Islamic law during the Mughal period, were made part of the British legal system. The East India Company established the legal system by appointing them as legal officers. Brahmin Pandits were also made part of the new legal system to receive advice on Hindu law. The British did not have to rely directly on Islamic fiqh books to implement Islamic law because they had traditional Qadis who were well-versed in Islamic jurisprudence. But gradually the East India Company tried to reduce the influence of Khadis. This is why the British, who had no Persian or Arabic base, started translating Islamic Fiqh books into English. The first such translation was that of the Hanafi book 'Hidaya'. Written by the 13th-century Hanafi scholar Burhanuddin Marginani, this book was the most popular book in the Hanafi madhhab in India. Since the British did not have the Arabic support, the translation was changed from the Persian translation of Hidayah to English. The Hidayah was a concise exposition of the Islamic civil and criminal market laws. However, the Hidayah did not deal with inheritance law. Following this, the British decided to translate another Hanafi book, Sirajjiya, under William Jones. This process of translation reduced Islamic jurisprudence from thousands of books to limited books. Apart from this, the British collected each case and published it for the reference of the courts and judges. William Magnaton's first collection of such old cases (Principles and Precedents of Muhammadan Law) was published in 1824. Stare decisis (When a court faces a legal argument, if a previous court has ruled on the same or a closely related issue, then the court will make their decision in alignment with the previous court's decision) was alien to Islamic jurisprudence. This was the British common law method. Apart from that, the British also brought the method of appeal to the higher courts. Under it, the final word on Islamic law became the Privy Council, headquartered in London. The likes of Joseph Shacht point out that the resulting new legal system was at the same time an amalgamation of Islamic English legal thought. Hence the British called it Anglo-Mohammedan Law. Initially, the East India Company Courts also relied on Islamic criminal and commercial laws as common law. Later, the First Law Commission (1834) chaired by T. B. Macaulay started discussions on making English laws common law. After the first independence movement in 1857, British-based common laws began to be widely imported into India. This was after the British Queen directly took over the administration of India from the East India Company after the First War of Independence and initiated radical administrative changes. Indian Criminal Code, 1862, Indian Transfer Act, 1882, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Contract Act, 1872, etc. are in force at present. At the same time, the British Queen announced in 1858 that the natives would have complete independence in terms of family/personal laws (Queen Victoria's Proclamation, 1858). The Queen's proclamation was sacrosanct and inviolable to the British. Hence, by the end of the nineteenth century, the scope of Islamic law was limited to the private sphere of the family/individual. In the 1860s, the British made an effort to interpret personal laws in a broader sense. The result is the English translation of Niel Beily's Fatawa Alangiri. The collection of Hanafi fatwas known as Fatwa Alangiri or Fatwa Hind was compiled by a number of Hanafi scholars during the reign of the Mughal emperor Aurangzeb at his behest. Only the parts covered by the Nilee Beily personal rules have been translated into English. It was published under the title 'Digest of Muhammadan Law'. It was during this period that the traditional experts, the Qadhis, were completely expelled from the judicial system. With this, the authorship of Islamic personal law was transferred to modernly trained judges and English translations. "What happens to the Shari’a is best described not as curtailment but as transmutation. Talal Asad's view that it is rendered into a subdivision of legal norms (fiqh) that are authorized and maintained by the centralizing state is confirmed by the history of Islamic laws in India. The influence of British laws was very evident in the Islamic personal laws that were transferred to British authority. Colonial court judgments therefore often sided with traditional sources of personal law. The Waqf-ul-Aulad controversy was a major controversy during the colonial period based on whether modern courts had complete authority over Islamic personal law. The British Supreme Court, the Privy Council, ruled that Waqf-ul-Aulad was invalid under Islamic law and that the Privy Council had the final word on the matter. The British judge Hob House announced such a verdict in 1893. At the same time, according to traditional Islamic sources, it was not forbidden to make waqf to one's own family. The rule against perpetuities was against the British market law, which allowed private individuals to become beneficiaries of the property. Muslims were unwilling to accept the British Supreme Court's authority on Islamic law. Following this, Muslims organized large protests in India. The Indian National Congress and the Muslim League came up with resolutions against the Privy Council. Ulama such as Shibli Noumani collected the fatwas of Islamic scholars from around the world to justify the acceptance of Waqf Aulad. Following this, Muhammad Ali Jinnah's Waqf Validation Bill was brought in 1911 and in 1913 it was officially approved. According to this law, the family waqf of Muslims is valid under Islamic personal law. This was the first codification of Islamic personal law in Indian history. It was also the first time in the history of the Privy Council itself that a judgment was overturned. This was seen as a decisive victory in the political history of the Muslims. In post-independence India, the judgment of the Supreme Court in the Shah Banu case once again raised the question of who the author of Islamic personal law is. According to the Supreme Court's judgment, the alimony of the divorced ex-wife is the responsibility of the ex-husband. due to the protest by misinformed clergy and vested politicians, Rajiv Gandhi's government overturned the Supreme Court's decision, thus squashing an important chance to reform Islamic law according to modern needs. Political class always used Islamic law as a bargaining tool stalling the timely modification of Muslim law. The fact is that there is no tendency to impose civil laws in any democratic country in the world today. There is a tendency in developed countries to allow even immigrants freedom in their civil laws. Countries that do not have democratic governments and such civil laws allow citizens and immigrants the right to live according to their civil laws. History also testifies that even the most anti-democratic colonial regimes did not encroach on indigenous peoples' civil liberties. It can be seen that in pre-modern history too, a totally alien arrangement was to encroach upon the freedom of the civil laws of different societies. Recognizing this fact, the 21st Law Commission proposed that personal laws in India are indicators of democracy and there is no need for a uniform civil code. So, any such attempt in the name of unification has to be seen as a challenge to human freedom and history itself. At the same time, efforts should be made by the Muslim community itself to reform themselves. while the nation is shedding its colonial legacy, if Islamic law lags it will be stuck in anachronism. It's high time for Muslim leadership to think about ways to free away from colonial laws to modernity. Many Arabian countries and progressive Muslim laws in Muslim countries show the way. In the churning times, if Muslims don’t shed social conservatism it will culminate in disaster. It’s precious to remember that the root cause of Partition was religious conservatism of Muslims when the global system advanced in terms of modernity and liberty. ----- A regular columnist for NewAgeIslam.com, Mubashir V.P is a PhD scholar in Islamic Studies at Jamia Millia Islamia and freelance journalist. URL: https://newageislam.com/debating-islam/reform-colonial-islamic-law-modern-realities/d/131243 New Age Islam, Islam Online, Islamic Website, African Muslim News, Arab World News, South Asia News, Indian Muslim News, World Muslim News, Women in Islam, Islamic Feminism, Arab Women, Women In Arab, Islamophobia in America, Muslim Women in West, Islam Women and Feminism

Conquest Of Samarkand: Best Example Of Islamic Justice In The History Of Warfare

By Ghulam Ghaus Siddiqi, New Age Islam 2 December 2023 First, Samarkand Was Conquered By The Muslim Army Under The Command Of General Qutaybah Ibn Muslim. Later, Islamic Justice, Under The Leadership Of Caliph Umar Bin Abdul Aziz, Led To The Return Of Samarkand To Its Native Inhabitants. ----- Siege of Samarkand (1868) - Wikipedia ----- You may question why the world has lost such wonderful and just leaders after reading Miss Fatma Dawood’s account of a unique event that took place during the reign of Umar bin Abdul Aziz, the grandson of the second Caliph, Hazrat Umar Farooq. This event revolves around Samarkand, the well-known Muslim general Qutaybah b. Muslim Bahili, and the justice that Caliph Umar bin Abdul Aziz demonstrated. Samarkand is the second-largest city in Uzbekistan. This city has a grand history of its own. Samarkand means "fortress of the earth." It suffices to know that Qutaybah ibn Muslim Bahili always dreamed of riding a horse and conquering new territories. How many conquers he made is best known to Allah, the Almighty. During the Umayyad era of Umar Bin Abdul Aziz's caliphate, Qutaybah ibn Muslim invaded Samarkand in 87 AH and placed the Islamic flag over it. Following the conquest of Samarkand, the priests who had previously ruled the region escaped to a temple atop a mountain and took refuge in their homes. The people of Samarkand were initially terrified of Muslims and avoided leaving their houses, not even to meet their needs. However, Muslims gradually won them over by exhibiting peace and trust, which caused people to go about their business again. It was discovered that Muslims were honest and did not lie or cheat in businesses and dealings. The perception of trust increased when a confrontation between two Samarkand and Muslim individuals ended with a Muslim Qaazi [judge] ruling in favour of the Samarqandi citizen and against the Muslim individual. When the monks at the temple heard about this impression of trust, they felt that the Muslim caliph must be a just leader. As a result, they sent a young man to inform the Muslim caliph about how unjustly Samarkand had been seized by Qutaybah ibn Muslim. When the young man reached the Caliph of the Muslims, ‘Umar ibn Abdul Aziz, he complained about Qutaybah ibn Muslim. The young man told the Caliph that the conquest of Samarkand was unfair and then asked him if he would agree to the Islamic tradition for Muslim armies about giving their enemies three options when they advance to conquer a territory: accept Islam, pay tribute, or prepare for battle. The Caliph agreed with the Islamic tradition narrated by the young man, stating that each adversary is free to choose any one of the three choices. The Caliph was then asked if it is permissible in Islam to launch a surprise attack to take land. He answered, "It is not our custom to do so, and Allah Almighty has ordered us not to do so, and our Prophet forbade us from being unjust." The young man continued by saying that, in defiance of Islamic tradition, Qutaybah ibn Muslim had launched a surprise attack on Samarkand. When the Caliph heard this, he wrote a short letter to the governor of Samarkand and told the young man to bring it to him so that he might correct the wrong that had taken place there. Upon his return to Samarkand from Damascus, the young man brought the letter to the priests, who ordered him to forward it to the governor. The letter astonished the governor since it asked him to appoint a judge between the Samarkand priests and Qutaybah Ibn Muslim, whom the governor was afraid of. He promptly designated a judge to make a ruling about the priests and Qutaybah. The judge questioned Qutaybah regarding the complaint and his answers to the questions. According to Qutaiba, Samarkand was a barrier and a cause of great loss for Muslims, and the war was a trick. The judge asked Qutaybah if he had offered them to choose between Islam, tribute, or war. In response, Qutaybah said, “No, we surprised them with what I told you earlier." The judge said, "Qutaybah, you confessed, and by this, the court’s duty ends," and stated that Allah supports the nation only through religion, avoiding treachery, and setting up justice. The judge issued a ruling that all Muslim armies should leave Samarkand and give the people the opportunity to prepare for war. If they chose war, they would fight. Following the commandment of Almighty Allah and the Sunnah of Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, Muslims declared that they would depart Samarkand as they had entered, taking nothing with them and giving Samarkand back to its people. The priests were astounded by this high standard of justice. The people of Samarkand observed the Muslims departing the region. One of the priests said that the actions of these Muslims prove "that their religion is right." The priests all converted to Islam, declaring that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is His Messenger." This story is considered the greatest example of justice in history, making the people of Samarkand satisfied with the rule of Islam and resulting in a large number of people entering the faith. ------ How Samarkand Was Conquered By Fatma Dawood 13 Jul 2011 The judge said, "Qutaybah, you confessed, and by this, the court’s duty ends." Samarkand is a great country located in North Asia. It has green mountains, hills, and forests that you can never imagine. Samarkand is a city filled with gold and silver, silk, porcelain, and natural resources. The people of Samarkand used to worship idols they made of jewellery. They placed these gods in a temple in the mountains. The temple was specifically made for senior monks, and there were a lot of small temples in the centre of Samarkand. In that era, Muslims were ruled by a Caliph who was an example because of his good manners, piety, and fear of God. He had many of the attributes of his grandfather, the second caliph, Al-Farooq ‘Umar ibn Al-Khattab; may Allah bless him. He governed a huge country that had never been ruled by anyone, not even by the Persian Chosroes, Roman Caesars, or Hakan. His kingdom extended from China to the Atlantic Ocean. His wife Fatima, the daughter of Caliph ‘Abd al-Malik and also the sister of Caliph Sulaiman, was the most honourable woman of her time, as seven of her relatives had been rulers. He was the Caliph, ‘Umar ibn Abdul Aziz. The Islamic army was under a commander who was very seasoned and merciful. His name was Qutaybah ibn Muslim. When the Islamic army led by him reached the outskirts of Samarkand, he ordered it to go to the mountain behind the city because he didn't want the people of Samarkand to see them. The Muslim army attacked the city. The battalions behind the mountains attacked as if they were a hurricane. They reached the centre of Samarkand without resistance. The monks had fled to the great temple in the mountains and hid in their homes. The people of Samarkand didn't go out of their homes for fear of the Muslims, but for Muslims, the situation was stable. Slowly, the people of Samarkand began to come out of their homes to fetch water and food. They started sending their young children to perform these tasks, and the Muslims didn't trouble them. Instead, the Muslims helped them fetch food and water. The children entered their homes with happiness. This situation began to spread feelings of trust and tranquillity in the hearts of the people of Samarkand. As a result, people returned to their shops, farms, and properties after some time. They found them intact, the same as they had left, nothing more or less. Normal life returned between Muslims and the people of Samarkand. They found that Muslims are faithful in their business and dealings; they did not lie or cheat. This impression rose when two people quarrelled. One of them was from the people of Samarkand, and the other was a Muslim. They went to the judge, who favoured the man from Samarkand. The news reached the runway monks in the mountain temple. They said that if this was their judgement, then they must have a fair ruler. They ordered their men to go to the ruler of the Muslims and tell him what happened. A young man went out. When he arrived in Damascus, he was full of fear. He saw a large palace. He told himself that this was the palace of their leader, but he saw people enter and exit without being stopped by a guard or soldier. He encouraged himself to enter this palace. It turned out to be the "Umayyad Mosque." It was studded with precious gems, ornaments, and majestic minarets. People kneeled down in this wonderful place. He saw Muslims praying together and was surprised to see how those people were sitting and how they lined up quickly. He stood up after the prayer and asked a Muslim about the palace of the ruler: "Where is your leader?" That Muslim told him he was the man who led the prayer. Didn't you see him? He said, "No. The Muslim told him, "Did you pray with us?" He said, "What is prayer?" The Muslim said: It is worshipping the Almighty Allah alone and becoming obedient to Him without any partner. The Muslim asked him, "Are you not a Muslim?" He said, "No. The Muslim smiled and asked him, "What is your religion?" He said, "the religion of the priests of Samarkand." The Muslim asked, "What is their religion?" He said, "They worship idols." The Muslim told him; we are Muslims. We worship God only. He described the caliph's home to him. The man went to that place and found an old clay house and an old man who was mending the wall. His clothes were full of mud. He went back to the mosque and told that Muslim who was making fun of him. “I asked you about your leader’s place, and you sent me to a poor man mending his wall,” he said. The young Muslim came with the stranger to that house and told him, "This is the Emir who is mending his wall." The stranger said, "Don't make fun of me.” The Muslim was swearing by Allah and said, "This is our leader." The stranger from Samarkand remembered the priests and how they were so proud that they did not easily talk to their people. While the stranger still stood surprised, a woman came with her son and asked the Caliph to increase her share of the grant from the Treasury because she had many children. Suddenly, the son of the woman hit the caliph's son and hurt him. They fought over a small toy. The Caliph's wife hurried towards her son and carried him away, shouting at the woman. The Caliph bandaged his son's head, went out to the woman, calmed her down, and took the toy from his own son and gave it to the woman's son. Then he told her to go to the treasurer and say that he could increase her money. The Caliph's wife said, "Her son hit your son, and then you raised her money". The Caliph told her, "You frightened her, and the Messenger of Allah, peace be upon him, said that whoever frightens a Muslim, Allah will frighten him on the Day of Resurrection.” He then went to complete the repair of his wall. The young man from Samarkand was surprised at what he saw. He dared and moved forward to ‘Umar ibn Abdul Aziz and said, you are the Emir of the Muslims? The Caliph Omar answered, "Yes, and what's your business?" The young man replied, "I have a complaint about Qutaybah ibn Muslim." The young man completed his story: Samarkand priests sent me, and they told me that it's from your traditions that when you conquer any country, you make them choose one of three things: invite them to Islam, ask them to pay tribute, and, in the event of their refusal of both choices, give them the choice of war. The Caliph said: Yes, this is our custom, and every country has the right to choose among the three. The young man said, "Is it in your custom to start the assault by surprise?" The Caliph said: "It is not our custom to do so, and Allah Almighty has ordered us not to do so, and our Prophet forbade us from being unjust." The young man said, "Qutaybah ibn Muslim did not do what you say, and his army attacked us by surprise." When the Caliph heard that Qutaybah did not make any suffering offers, it was not his habit to listen to only one side. He decided to write to the governor of Samarkand. He wrote a few lines and ordered the young man to take it to the governor of Samarkand, who would remove the injustice that had taken place there. The young man returned from Damascus to Samarkand, wondering about what a paper can do in front of the swords of Qutaybah ibn Muslim! When he arrived at Samarkand, he gave the paper to the priests, who told him, in return, to take it to the governor to do what's written in it. The young man went to the governor and gave him the letter. The governor was surprised to notice the seal on the letter. He read the letter, which contained the following: "To the governor of Samarkand, peace and mercy of God be upon you. Appoint a judge between the priests of Samarkand and Qutaybah ibn Muslim; put yourself in the place of Qutaybah." The Caliph didn't want to distract Qutaybah from his duties and defence activity. The governor could not do anything except obey what was written in the letter. He appointed a judge quickly. The judge selected a day to meet in the mosque and ordered the priests to be present during the meeting. He ordered the people as well to come in the presence of Qutaybah ibn Muslim. The judge did not like to hear the case in the absence of Qutaybah, who was at the time a very strong commander. He was the head of the most powerful army in the world at the time. Qutaybah had reached China, continuing his conquests. But the judge ordered him to return, and he did return after two days. When the priests knew that Qutaybah had returned, they became very fearful. Qutaybah entered the mosque, put down his sword, and took off his shoes. The judge told him to sit next to his opponent. The priest stood up and said, Qutaybah ibn Muslim entered our country without warning us. He didn't give us a warning or give us the options of invitation to Islam, payment of tribute, or war. Instead, he attacked us without warning. The judge turned to the commander, Qutaybah ibn Muslim, and asked him, "What do you say about this complaint?" Qutaybah said, "War is a trick. This country is a great obstacle to us, and all those who were like it did not resist paying tribute and did not want to enter Islam, and had we fought them, they would have killed more of us than we would have killed from them." He continued, “And with the help of Allah and surprise, we defended Muslims from great harm, and history is witness to what I say. And all the countries beyond them became easy to conquer. Yes, we surprised them but rescued them and let them know about Islam.” The judge said, "Qutaybah! Did you invite them to Islam, tribute, or war?” Qutaybah replied, “No, we surprised them with what I told you before." The judge said, "Qutaybah, you confessed, and by this, the court’s duty ends. Qutaybah, Allah supports this nation only through religion, avoiding treachery, and setting up justice. We were out of our homes for jihad, for Allah's sake. We didn't go out to conquer lands and occupy countries unjustly." Then the judge issued his ruling: "I rule that all armies of Muslims in this country should get out of this country and give it back to its people and give them the opportunity to prepare for war, and then make them choose between Islam, tribute, or war. If they choose war, then we will fight. Muslims will get out of Samarkand without anything just as they entered and deliver the city to its people, and that is the application of the law of Almighty Allah and the Sunnah of our Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him." After this, Muslims started to leave the city. The judge came out in front of the priests. The priests did not believe what they were seeing. The people of Samarkand kept watching Muslims until they all went out of their city. The young priest said, "What they did proves that their religion is right." I witness that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is His Messenger." Now all the priests pronounced that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is His Messenger, and they entered Islam. This is the story of the greatest court in history. It made the people of Samarkand satisfied with the rule of Islam, and, as a result, people entered Islam in hordes. ---- (References: Stories from History, The Story of Samarkand Court by Sheikh Tantawi, and Islam and International Law by Sheikh Wahbeh al-Zuhaili) Source: How Samarkand Was Conquered URL: https://newageislam.com/islamic-history/conquest-samarkand-islamic-justice-warfare/d/131236 New Age Islam, Islam Online, Islamic Website, African Muslim News, Arab World News, South Asia News, Indian Muslim News, World Muslim News, Women in Islam, Islamic Feminism, Arab Women, Women In Arab, Islamophobia in America, Muslim Women in West, Islam Women and Feminism

Time To Be Civilized And Compassionate

By Sumit Paul, New Age Islam 2 December 2023 Haq Hai Har Shakhs Ka Zindagi Par Jyon Haq Hai Har Kisi Ka Bandagi Par Insaaf Ke Naam Pe Saza-E-Maut Do Sharm Aati Hai Insaan Ki Darindagi Par 'Nashtar ' Nishapuri (Every individual is entitled to life/ The way everyone is free to worship/ Capital punishment in the name of justice/ I'm ashamed of the savagery of humans) The demand for abolishing the death penalty got a fresh impetus on Wednesday, November 22, when most lawyers present at a Supreme Court hearing on reducing instances of capital punishment wanted the provision to go. Their stand aligns with the growing worldwide support for its abolition. Close to three-quarters of the world has abolished it (courtesy, ET, November 26, Hang on, rethink the death penalty https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinion/et-editorial/hang-on-rethink-the-death-penalty/articleshow/105518327.cms). Much has been written and debated in favour of the abolition of death rap over the years. Now is time for India to dispense with it to be called a civilized country. Less than a year ago, CJI questioned the validity of hanging. Now the SC lawyers are also of the view that it must be abolished. Any mode of execution, be it hanging, firing squad, beheading (zenith of barbarism), electric chair, lethal injection or poisoning, will continue to be questioned not because of more or less pain inflicted upon the convicts, but for moral reasons that have far and wide ramifications. Granted, a person has committed a heinous crime and killed someone. Executing him for that cannot be called justice. It's retribution, validated by the State and the Judiciary. Moreover, the logic of 'the rarest of the rare' principle is so subjective, obscure and baffling. Many a time, those who're resourceful and can hire big lawyers, cheat the gallows and poor people are sent to the scaffold. "Zindagi Ne Jeete Ji Ki Na Koi Raham/ Aayee Maut Toh Woh Bhi Iss Qadar Beraham" (While living, life remained so harsh and unkind/ Alas, when death arrived, it was also macabre). Urdu poet Justice Anand Narayan Mulla wrote this couplet when a very poor convict was hanged at Naini prison near Allahabad. He was a judge of Allahabad High Court at that time. If you observe the list of the 62 executed convicts beginning from Nathuram Godse and N D Apte (November 15, 1949) at Ambala Central Jail to the four convicts, of Nirbhaya rape and murder case, hanged at Tihar in Delhi on March 20, 2020, you'll be surprised that most of the executed convicts were really poor. Two brothers Kartar Singh and Ujagar Singh, the hired killers who were hanged at Tihar, for killing the famous eye-surgeon Dr Jain's wife, committed the crime for 500 rupees! Both never got a decent lawyer to fight for them. That's the reason, capital punishment is all the more reprehensible and lopsided. A civilized society has no place for this type of judicial murder. Are we voyeurs, getting some kind of orgasmic kick out of an execution of an individual? Do away with it forthwith. ----- A regular columnist for New Age Islam, Sumit Paul is a researcher in comparative religions, with special reference to Islam. He has contributed articles to the world's premier publications in several languages including Persian. URL: https://newageislam.com/spiritual-meditations/civilized-compassionate/d/131242 New Age Islam, Islam Online, Islamic Website, African Muslim News, Arab World News, South Asia News, Indian Muslim News, World Muslim News, Women in Islam, Islamic Feminism, Arab Women, Women In Arab, Islamophobia in America, Muslim Women in West, Islam Women and Feminism

Brazen, Unprovoked Attack On Three Palestinian College Students: What Is Happening in Vermont?

By Jesse Wegman Dec. 1, 2023 The first sign that something was amiss came in the form of three police cruisers idling, unbidden, in the lot behind the Islamic Society of Vermont, the state’s largest mosque, last Saturday night in South Burlington. Usually there would be only one cop, paid for by the mosque during gatherings like the community potluck being held that evening. An asphalt path leading to a parking lot. A footpath in South Burlington, Vt., connects the Islamic Society of Vermont and the Congregation of Temple Sinai.Credit...Jude Domski for the New York Times ----- “We said, ‘Something fishy’s going on,’” Fuad al-Amoody, the vice president of the society’s executive board, told me. Then he started receiving text messages about a shooting in Burlington, about 10 minutes up the road. “We ended up putting two and two together.” The brazen, unprovoked attack on three Palestinian college students, who were walking down a quiet residential street while visiting relatives here over Thanksgiving, shook the area’s tight-knit community of Muslims. On Monday, authorities charged Jason Eaton, a 48-year-old white man who lived on the street, with three counts of attempted murder. He has pleaded not guilty and is being held without bail. For many in Vermont, the horror of the shooting was compounded by its violation of the state’s self-image as a uniquely welcoming place. Vermonters pride themselves on their neighbourliness, taking in waves of refugees from across the globe. “This brave little state says no to hate” is a popular if unofficial slogan on yard signs. It’s also one of the safest states in the country, although it has seen increases in crime since the pandemic. “By far, Vermont is the best place to live,” said Mr. al-Amoody, whose day job is as a semiconductor engineer, ticking off the other states he has lived in since he came to the United States from Kenya a quarter-century ago. “It is very peaceful.” A man standing with his head bowed in a large room at the Islamic Society of Vermont. Fuad al-Amoody Credit...Jude Domski for the New York Times ------ It is also very white — nearly 94 percent, according to the 2020 census. My family and I bumped that number a few notches higher when we moved here in 2020. Coming directly from New York City, we were startled as much by the racial uniformity as the farm equipment rumbling by our house at dawn every day. We had somehow missed the “Saturday Night Live” skit from 2018 in which several neo-Confederates rail against America’s racial diversity and debate founding a new homeland — somewhere with “no immigrants, no minorities,” the group’s leader declares. “An agrarian community where everyone lives in harmony, because every single person is white.” “Yeah, I know that place,” one pipes up. “That sounds like Vermont.” The audience laughs, but today the sketch lands chillingly. The students told the police that they were wearing their kaffiyehs and speaking a mix of Arabic and English when they were shot. Vermont’s overwhelming homogeneity is always apparent to people of color here, and it can create a persistent sense of insiders and outsiders, no matter how well intentioned the efforts to push past it. The authorities have not yet added a hate-crime enhancement to the charges against Mr. Eaton, who moved to the neighbourhood a few months ago and has struggled with depression, according to his mother. Still, it’s hard to ignore the current atmosphere of tension and vitriol surrounding the ongoing war between Israel and Hamas, which has led to clashes and hate incidents around the country. This week I walked down North Prospect Street, where the shooting occurred. The street runs along the edge of the city’s Old North End, just off the University of Vermont’s main quad. Wide sidewalks pass by rambling old colonial revivals and multiunit houses like the one where Mr. Eaton lived. Within a couple of blocks of the shooting there is a large synagogue and a Quaker meeting house, in front of which a makeshift sign was decorated with a green heart and the words “Neighbors stand against hate.” I went in the chilly early evening, around when the attack took place, and all seemed quiet and calm, as I imagine it had to the young men in the moments before their world exploded. In front of the Islamic centre, a sign reading, "More ISVT parking at Temple Sinai if parking lot full." The mosque and synagogue are next door to each other and share a parking lot. Credit...Jude Domski for The New York Times A white-painted house with a porch. The shooting took place outside of 69 North Prospect Street. Credit...Jude Domski for The New York Times ------ It was this juxtaposition — between the state’s welcoming nature and its monochromatic reputation — that led me to reach out to Mr. al-Amoody. As a white guy who has the luxury of not having to look over my shoulder when I’m walking down the street, I was hoping to get a better sense of what life is like for Muslims and Arab Americans in a state like this, where rural roads are dotted with “Black Lives Matter” signs and gun shops in equal measure. Mr. al-Amoody estimated there are roughly 5,000 Muslims state-wide, the vast majority of whom live in and around Burlington, the largest city in a state with about 650,000 residents. Until recently, those looking for a place to worship outside a private basement or garage had one choice: a corner of a building that was once, among other things, a former cavalry post for the U.S. Army. It was repurposed for Islamic prayer in 1999, but as the community grew, its members needed more space. They found it in a former church in South Burlington, which they bought in 2019 from the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Today the mosque counts roughly 350 families as members. It sits next door to a synagogue, which shares its parking lot on Fridays to help accommodate Muslim worshipers on their holy day. (The mosque returns the favour on Saturdays.) There were more examples of generosity, Mr. al-Amoody said. Among the hundreds of emails he received in the days after the shooting were numerous offers of help, including one from a non-Muslim woman in the college town of Middlebury, about an hour south of Burlington, offering lodging and a car to the students, who are from out of state, while they recover. “It has been like this all along,” he told me. I heard versions of that sentiment from others. Farhad Khan has lived in Middlebury for most of his 30 years in the state. When he first arrived, he said, “we were so out of place, we opened the Yellow Pages and looked for names — Abdul, Mohammed — and we’d call those numbers.” Today he sits on the town’s select board and owns and runs a local dollar store with his wife, Amtul. He finds Vermont one of the most inclusive states in the country but said he still faces racism, usually of the subtle type: a customer’s seemingly stray comment about Amtul’s hijab or complimenting him on his English. The number of such incidents has gone up in recent years, he said, especially since Donald Trump’s election. For others, the attack came as no surprise, and not because of Mr. Trump. “Just like the U.S., Vermont likes to think it’s exceptional,” said Mia Schultz, a Black Vermonter and the president of the Rutland-area N.A.A.C.P., who is not Muslim. “Which is why when violence happens like this, people are shocked. But the thing is, people of color are not.” I brought up the state’s enormous white population as a demographic curiosity when she stopped me. “Why do you think that is?” she asked. “I don’t think it’s an accident. There are people who want to live here, but it becomes so incredibly suffocating. You’re met with smiles, this idea of kindness,” she said, and yet behind it there is an isolation, an insidious feeling of not being seen as equal. That’s not counting the more openly racist acts or the encounters with law enforcement and other authorities that serve as a constant reminder of one’s status as a permanent suspect. Vermont’s problem is not in recruiting people of colour, she said, but in retaining them. “I know about people who go back to the South because, they say, ‘At least I know what I’m encountering,’” she said. “I know how to navigate people who are outright hateful.” Ms. Schultz has not left, though she said she has been tempted. Instead, she recently accepted an appointment to Vermont’s new Truth and Reconciliation Commission, which the state established last year to begin dismantling institutional, structural and systemic discrimination in Vermont. “The fact that they want to examine themselves, for me, feels hopeful,” she said. Still, she acknowledged it can be hard to find support in a place as underpopulated and spread out as Vermont. “You come here as a person of color, and you’re, all of a sudden, isolated. You don’t have a community to affirm what you’ve experienced,” Ms. Schultz said. I thought back to something Mr. al-Amoody told me. The first thing he did after learning of the shooting was drive to the hospital, offer assistance to the relatives of the victims and send a message to the mosque’s mailing list — to confirm the facts he knew and dispel rumours that had begun to circulate. It sounds simple, and yet that’s how you take outsiders and make them a community. ------ Jesse Wegman is a member of the editorial board, where he has written about the Supreme Court and national legal affairs since 2013. He is the author of “Let the People Pick the President: The Case for Abolishing the Electoral College.” Source: What Is Happening in Vermont? URL: https://newageislam.com/islam-politics/brazen-attack-palestinian-vermont/d/131234 New Age Islam, Islam Online, Islamic Website, African Muslim News, Arab World News, South Asia News, Indian Muslim News, World Muslim News, Women in Islam, Islamic Feminism, Arab Women, Women In Arab, Islamophobia in America, Muslim Women in West, Islam Women and Feminism

Friday, December 1, 2023

Untouchability Is a Doctrinal Axis of Hinduism

By Sumit Paul, New Age Islam 1 December 2023 This pertains to the disturbing news item that a temple in UP was 'Purified' after, Saiyada Khatoon, a Muslim MLA's visit. Mr Ghulam Mohiyuddin aptly commented that this sick mentality generated untouchability. The stupid reason cited for this 'purification' will make you laugh: "Because Sayeda Khatoon is a Muslim and eats cow meat, her visit to this holy place had made it impure,"Dharamraj Verma said, adding, "After this purification, this place has now become completely pure." Does this foolish man know that so many Hindus consume beef and they visit temples. Many Hindus in Kerala eat cow meat and they go to temples. A large number of Bengalis love to gorge on beef steaks and Chapli Kababs (Chapli Kababs are usually made from ground beef) and pay obeisance to their deities. One of the earliest philosophers in recorded history, Yagyavalkya, who questioned many metaphysical propositions, says, 'I eat it (beef) only if it is cooked till it is tender.' The king of the gods, Indra, too is said to be fond of beef. In the Rig Veda, Indra demands that he be served 15 to 20 cooked oxen (Indra must have been a glutton!). It was a custom in the Vedic ages to offer a cow to a priest. And - if not a full cow - beef was a must for the Madhuparka or offerings. Later, the practice became symbolic of sacrifice. In the Mahabharata, Vyasa is seen accepting a cow but releasing it thereafter. Here the cow is neither killed nor consumed. Because, by then, people had understood that the animal was very useful in daily life, Today's neo-Hindus (sorry, Sanatanis) , like the ignorant followers of other faiths, are not aware of their religious history, heritage and symbolism. They don't know Sanskrit just like most of the fanatic Muslims on the sub-continent don't know Arabic. Semi-educated Hindus, lacking in power of reasoning, logic and dialectic, go bananas over Adi Shankar, not knowing Shankara's open sympathy and support for sectarian views of the ancient treatises on Dharma or law codes. Shankara's most regressive and reactionary view on Sudras is revealed in his commentary on the sutra I.iii.38 on how the Sudras should be prohibited from hearing the Vedas. The Gotama Dharma sutra XII.4, which Shankara refers to here, says “then should he (the Sudra) happen to hear the Vedas, the expiation consists in his ears being filled with (molten) lead and lac.” Hindu religion has been professing casteism, discrimination and untouchability from the beginning and its so-called 'enlightened' exponents like Adi Shankara, Kumaril Bhatt, Mandan Mishra and Vachaspati Mishra (see, all Brahmins!), among others sanctioned untouchability. In short, untouchability is a doctrinal axis of Hinduism. ----- A regular columnist for New Age Islam, Sumit Paul is a researcher in comparative religions, with special reference to Islam. He has contributed articles to the world's premier publications in several languages including Persian. URL: https://newageislam.com/spiritual-meditations/untouchability-doctrinal-axis-hinduism/d/131230 New Age Islam, Islam Online, Islamic Website, African Muslim News, Arab World News, South Asia News, Indian Muslim News, World Muslim News, Women in Islam, Islamic Feminism, Arab Women, Women In Arab, Islamophobia in America, Muslim Women in West, Islam Women and Feminism

Hindu-Muslim Unity Saved 41 Lives in Uttarakhand Tunnel Rescue Operation - Munna Qureshi, Hailed as Operation's Hero

By Syed Ali Mujtaba, New Age Islam 1 December 2023 In a befitting reply to the Hindutva forces who are working overtime to ostracize Muslims from India, seven Muslims and three Hindu workers united together to rescue 41 men trapped in in Silkyara-Barkot tunnel in Uttarakhand on November 28. The 41 persons were trapped for 17 days since November 12. Rescue officials with Uttarakhand chief minister Pushkar Singh Dhami and Union minister of State VK Singh after the successful completion of the rescue mission. (PTI) ------- These Rat-Hole Miners, as they are called are; Hasan, Munna Qureshi, Naseem Malik, Nasir Khan, Firoz Qureshi, Rashid Ansari, and Irshad Ansari, along with Monu Kumar, Saurabh, Jatin Kumar, Ankur, Devendra who come from Delhi and Bulandshahr in Uttar Pradesh. They were called into action when the power-generated drilling machine gave way and it took them around 26-27 hours to dig through around 12-15 meters of hole to reach the trapped persons. These rescue workers who are aged between 20 and 45 dug the last stretch of the tunnel with their hands to rescue the trapped persons. They worked in four shifts of six hours each to make sure the work went on continuously. They dug roughly 12 meters in cramped pipes to reach the trapped men in a hopeless situation. The rescue workers are employees of Delhi-based Rockwell Enterprises, who were sent on this special mission from Delhi by Mr Vaqeel Hasan, the head of the Rockwell Enterprise. In a media briefing, Mr Vaqeel Hasan, while underscoring the diversity of faiths in his team emphasized that the job couldn’t have been done alone. . “In our team, there are both Hindus and Muslims and people from both religions worked hard to save these 41 lives. None of them could have done this alone, and this is the message I want to give to everyone… We should all live in harmony and not spread the poison of hate. We all want to give our 100 percent for the country… Please convey my message to everyone.” He was briefing the media after the rescue mission was accomplished The rescue workers did not take any money for the work. They said they were motivated to save the lives of 41 persons on whom “more than 140 crore people of India and the whole world were holding deep breath while watching this rare operation. It won’t be out of context to mention the deteriorating Hindu-Muslim relations in Uttrakhand. During the last ‘Bakrid,’ festival Muslims in Uttarakhand were barred from offering Eid prayers in Badrinath town. Muslim residents of Badrinath who are mostly migrant laborers working on reconstruction projects at temples were asked by the authorities not to hold prayers inside the town and go to Joshimath, a neighboring town, some 25 miles away. Hindutva militants in Uttarakhand also called for the mass expulsion of Muslims during the hate speech, vigilantism, and targeted communal violence in the state. Muslims’ homes and shops were marked with an ‘X’, and Muslim residents were forced to vacate the place. Newspapers had reported that a letter was sent by the Vishwa Hindu Parishad to the Tehri District Magistrate giving an ultimatum to members of the Muslims Community to leave the Jaunpur valley and in particular the towns of Nainbagh, Jakhar, Nagtibba, Thatyur, Saklana, Damta, Purola, Barkot, and Uttarkashi, threatening their ethnic cleansing Neither the Uttrakhand government nor the administration nor the judiciary intervened to prevent violent attacks against the Muslims in the state. Now the demonstration of the Hindu-Muslim unity shown in the rescue mission of the Silkyara-Barkot tunnel sends a message that is loud and clear; Hindu-Muslim unity remains an impregnable fort in India. The Hindutva zealots no matter how many times chant Jai Sri Ram, cannot breach this fort of unity that is constructed together after 1400 years of peaceful coexistence. ------ Syed Ali Mujtaba is a journalist based in Chennai. URL: https://newageislam.com/interfaith-dialogue/hindu-muslim-uttarakhand-tunnel-operation/d/131227 New Age Islam, Islam Online, Islamic Website, African Muslim News, Arab World News, South Asia News, Indian Muslim News, World Muslim News, Women in Islam, Islamic Feminism, Arab Women, Women In Arab, Islamophobia in America, Muslim Women in West, Islam Women and Feminism